Google may cop $10m fine for Safari gaffe

By
Follow google news

US authorities prepare case.

The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) could fine Google US$10 million for circumventing privacy protections in Apple’s iPhone and iPad browser, Safari.

Google may cop $10m fine for Safari gaffe

The regulator is preparing a case on the basis that Google deceived consumers, Bloomberg reported, citing a source familiar with the case.

The FTC will allege that Google broke a 2011 agreement with the commission over an earlier privacy gaffe.

The FTC began investigating Google's latest alleged breach in March this year, shortly after Stanford University graduate student Jonathan Mayer discovered Google “immunised” itself from Safari’s cookie blocking policy using a specially-crafted IFrame. 

The potential fine comes as European data protection authorities consider widening ongoing investigations into Google’s StreetView global wi-fi ‘war driving’ privacy breach, the New York Times reported last week. 

Privacy regulators in the Netherlands and Germany claimed Google had duped them during their investigations, following Google’s release of the Federal Communications Commission’s report of its US investigation, which revealed several Google employees knew StreetView cars were harvesting private data from unencrypted wireless access points. 

The FCC found Google had not breached US laws, but fined it US$25,000 for obstructing its investigation.

Got a news tip for our journalists? Share it with us anonymously here.
Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.
Tags:

Most Read Articles

National photo licence recognition system set to go live in 2025

National photo licence recognition system set to go live in 2025

David Jones eyes AI super-agent opportunity

David Jones eyes AI super-agent opportunity

Westpac looks to broad AI integration within the business bank

Westpac looks to broad AI integration within the business bank

ANZ CEO backs Plus tech stack, but changes "inefficient" delivery

ANZ CEO backs Plus tech stack, but changes "inefficient" delivery

Log In

  |  Forgot your password?