Krinsky sued the defendant, known only as 'Doe 6' as his onscreen name contains an expletive, along with nine other posters for comments made about the company.
Although Krinsky initially won the right to have the posters identified, the new ruling stated that their right to anonymity must prevail under free speech laws.
The court acknowledged that the comments were "unquestionably offensive and demeaning", but that they came under free speech laws since they could not be considered a assertions of facts.
A similar case almost unfolded in Australia last year when popular broadband forum, Whirlpool, was threatened with legal action over derogatory comments posted to its forum. The company who brought forth the case withdrew it one week later amid immense media and concerned citizen pressure.
_(20).jpg&h=140&w=231&c=1&s=0)
_(28).jpg&h=140&w=231&c=1&s=0)
_(22).jpg&h=140&w=231&c=1&s=0)
.png&h=140&w=231&c=1&s=0){kind=logo}
_(26).jpg&w=100&c=1&s=0)
iTnews Executive Retreat - Security Leaders Edition
_(1).jpg&h=140&w=231&c=1&s=0)
