I am surprised at this lapse by a man so highly respected in the industry. It was astonishing to read throwaway lines like "in the US, it is now said ..." and "some estimates place the number of infections as high as 50 per cent".
Who said what in the US and, er, which estimates would these be? He then goes on to make a dubious analogy between the security flaws in the internet and the medical profession. This kind of stuff has no place in a serious journal such as SC. Make claims, but make them quantifiable.
Natasha Sparks, Oldham.
_(37).jpg&h=140&w=231&c=1&s=0)
_(36).jpg&h=140&w=231&c=1&s=0)
_(33).jpg&h=140&w=231&c=1&s=0)
Cyber Resilience Summit
iTnews Executive Retreat - Security Leaders Edition
Huntress + Eftsure Virtual Event -Fighting A New Frontier of Cyber-Fraud: How Leaders Can Work Together
iTnews Cloud Covered Breakfast Summit
Live & Hands On Demo: Navigating the BMC AMI DevX Platform to Understand Code Faster Using AI
_(1).jpg&h=140&w=231&c=1&s=0)
