OLPC announced the XP partnership earlier this month, after several years of debate with Microsoft, who was hesitant to collaborate with any organisation that supported open source software.
Microsoft said the XP laptops will be piloted in “four or five countries” over the next several months and expects a full roll-out by September.
OLPC’s XO laptop has traditionally run on a Linux operating system and Sugar interface, which open source advocates say provides a more collaborative and kid-friendly atmosphere.
The laptops were specifically built for children in developing nations between the ages of six and twelve, with a brightly coloured small keyboard and screen with little “ears” (wireless receivers), and gaming, animation, and music capabilities.
On the heels of the XP announcement, many in the open source community are wondering if the Microsoft deal is simply a case of adults applying adult standards to a product that is so obviously made for children.
Even OLPC founder Nicholas Negroponte, who initiated the deal, attributes it to adult wishes and is quoted as saying: “The people who buy the machines are not the children who use them, but government officials in most cases and those people are much more comfortable with Windows.”
Indeed it has been reported that several prospective OLPC countries, like Egypt, have demanded the computers come equipped with a more familiar operating system, which some think goes against the whole spirit of the program.
“I think the whole point of OLPC is education,” said Sydney Linux Users Group president Sridhar Dhanapalan.
“If you give a child a system that is designed for an office desktop worker, is that really appropriate?”
“To a child who’s never seen an office before, it doesn’t mean anything to them. If you give them, some Office applications like Excel or Word, what does that mean to them? It doesn’t mean anything, it doesn’t engage their creativity, and it’s not fun for them.”
Dhanapalan thinks even the label of “laptop” may be too advanced for the product.
“I think there’s been too much emphasis on this thing as a laptop, and that makes people instantly compare this device to any standard mainstream laptops which are very much not made for the conditions that these machines will see,” he said.
“Because they’re thinking of them as laptops, they’re thinking they have to have Windows and Office and all that, and it’s inappropriate. If you see it as a learning tool, if you see it more akin to a souped up Speak and Spell, you think Fischer Price and that makes more sense.”
The addition of Windows slightly drives up the US$188 price tag, which OLPC hopes to one day sell for US$100.
Solely Windows based machines will cost an extra US$3 per laptop for the fee Microsoft normally charges developing countries, and machines that run both XP and Linux will cost US$7 more per laptop for the extra hardware.
With the upcoming launch of an OLPC branch in Australia, organiser Jeff Waugh believes that though some parents and politicians may prefer XP, they still have the chance to provide a quality learning experience for kids across the country.
“I imagine some in Australia may say they want XP, but my personal perspective is that XP doesn’t let OLPC do the same things that Linux does, it doesn’t provide the amazing design and ability for the community to sustainably develop,” he said.
“I don’t really think this announcement will be relevant to a lot of people other than those who aren’t comfortable with their kids using something different and see Linux as a second-class citizen to Windows.”
“Australia is in a very good position to have a cross divide approach for the rollout, we have remote areas and we have average public primary schools. The opportunity to bring the educational opportunities to all the kids in that area can create amazing social and cultural opportunities,” Waugh said.
Opinion: Open Source advocates discuss Windows addition to OLPC
By Ashley Clark on Jun 6, 2008 3:21PM