Conroy unsold on Telstra "erosion" claims

 

Incumbent already eroding.

Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has denied proposed laws to split Telstra would erode the telco's shareholder value, believing the incumbent was doing that on its own.

Speaking at the launch of NBN Co's mainland test sites in Sydney, Conroy faced a barrage of questions over Telstra, which threatened to derail the purpose of the launch.

It came after Telstra sent a letter to shareholders [PDF] that said the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Bill was "likely to destroy shareholder value and makes an agreement with NBN Co and the Government harder to achieve."

The Bill proposed, among other things, a wholesale-retail split of Telstra - with the threat of being left out of next-generation wireless spectrum auctions if it didn't comply.

Conroy was not buying the telco's argument that the Bill would erode shareholder value.

"That might be true if their share price hadn't fallen below $3 before the Bill was issued," Conroy said.

Telstra shares fell below $3 for only the second time since listing on the sharemarket late last month.

The carrier also recently reported declining PSTN revenues at rates even they had not anticipated.

NBN Retail?

Telstra's letter to shareholders also voiced clear displeasure in the Government leaving open the possibility of NBN Co having some form of retail operation if they acquired it in the course of trying to build the wholesale network.

This was spelled out in separate legislation to the split bill, currently drafted for public review.

"Although this is only draft legislation, it raises for the first time the prospect of NBN Co becoming a Government-funded retailer, not just a wholesale network provider," Telstra said.

"We are very concerned about this potential change in the Government's position. If enacted, we would need to factor this into the financial consideration required to achieve an agreement that is in the company's and your best interests."

Conroy would not be drawn on whether the shareholder letter posed difficulties in ongoing negotiations between NBN Co and Telstra.

He repeatedly said the legislation was a draft and could change as it progressed.


Conroy unsold on Telstra "erosion" claims
"@Singo79, ABSOLUTELY. Telstra Erosion is 100% due to the totally incompetent managment team previously running the previously. How a board could appoint an obnoxious Mexican and his 28 Amigo's to ..."
By Digger11
 
 
 
Comments: 4
singo79
Mar 2, 2010 7:10 PM
Time for Telstra to suffer the pain that it has inflicted on Australians for the past decade!

The only losers here are the Telstra shareholders, whom themselves are guilty of complicity. They were all happy to sit back and watch Telstra rape the Australian telco market and try and underhandedly force out its competitors whilst making ludicrous profits. But now that that Telstra is on the back foot and with a constantly declining share price, they shareholders are out in anger.

Time to deal with it! In this world it has been proven many times, that you can't have your cake and eat it to.
zag
Mar 2, 2010 11:44 PM
The share price will have been dropping for ages due to the NBNco and gov.

The gov is basically looking to wipe out Telstra and re setup Telecom Australia, all the 3rd party ISPs are going to get wiped once, NBNco start up a retail section.

what I find appalling is that the Gov is basically altering the laws just so they get things as they like, don't follow their own competition protocols and hold off people.

They have also told all the fiber network owners your next and we'll simply take your network off you.

This is a complete farce, and will screw the net in this country.
Bob
Mar 3, 2010 8:55 AM
There seems to be a lot of confusion about whether this proposed "split" is to be fixed network where there is a perceived monopoly vs mobile network which is already completely deregulated or if it is a wholesale vs retail split. Does Conroy really understand the industry?

Telstra is the only provider to provide national voice and broadband mobile coverage in the completely deregulated environment. Does he want to kill that private investment as I can see private companies of all industries just picking up bags and walking out of the country Murdoch style.
Digger11
Mar 3, 2010 9:18 AM
@Singo79, ABSOLUTELY.

Telstra Erosion is 100% due to the totally incompetent managment team previously running the previously. How a board could appoint an obnoxious Mexican and his 28 Amigo's to run the "proud Aussie company" must surely be the biggest mistake in public company history in Australia.

They fought everyone, spent $m's on lawyers and accountants, argued every possible way to keeep their Monopoly (even coming up with FTTN to strand competitors DSLAM's), and guess what ???? - everyone got sick and tired of their antics, including the Govt.

If Telstra wants to blame someone for their demise then I suggest they install huge mirrors in their meeting rooms.
British Telecom embraced competition and is now doing well - tch tch tch Telstra.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Vito Forte: A CIO for tough times
Fortescue Metals CIO talks vendor management and innovation.
 
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Vodafone Australia churn nears half a million for 2011
British joint owners 'not pleased'.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  83%
 
No
  17%
TOTAL VOTES: 245

Vote