Government to keep a leash on NBN Co

 

Legislation enshrines power in the hands of the Minister.

NBN Co is to remain Government property until Minister Conroy sees fit, according to an exposure draft of legislation enshrining the National Broadband Network (NBN) introduced to Parliament today.

The legislation said that whilst the Commonwealth has committed to "sell down its stake in NBN Co" within five years from when the national network is up and running, the sale is "subject to market circumstances and security considerations".

The Communications Minister must determine that the network is "fully built and operational" - and the Finance Minister must determine that it is the right time to sell - before any decision on NBN Co's sell-off is taken.

The legislation "allows the Communications Minister to extend the time" to declare that the network is finished, using an unlimited number of "declared pre-termination periods" of up to 12 months each.

Once the Communications Minister declares the network finished, the Finance Minister has five years (plus an extension of a further 12 months, if need be) to sell down the Government's stake in NBN Co.

But there is an exception: the Government has also allowed itself the ability to sell up to 49 percent of its equity in NBN Co prior to the NBN being built and fully operational, as long as the Government maintains the majority stake.

"The Government welcomes private investment in NBN Co so long as it does not compromise the wholesale only model," the explanatory notes to the legislation read.

"The Government will set out any necessary ownership controls to protect this wholesale only model in regulations."

Wholesale only

The legislation enshrines that NBN Co can only be a wholesale provider of telecommunications services, or else its license is revoked. It is also not permitted to be a content player - preventing what is arguably Australia's next Telstra from becoming Australia's next Foxtel.

But there are some notable exceptions.

Firstly, Minister Conroy has given himself the power to pick and choose exceptions. This flexibility will "allow NBN Co to offer services directly to certain end-users, for example government agencies."

The Minister also has the right to force NBN Co to not provide a given service if he feels it doesn't have "socially beneficial outcomes, or conversely that its supply of a service may hinder the development of competition."

The Telstra problem

The second major exception relates to the Government's great white NBN hope, that Telstra CEO David Thodey will submit to Australia's largest service provider being swallowed up by NBN Co.

Any law that forces NBN Co to only maintain a wholesale operation is somewhat challenging in the face of NBN Co's attempts to negotiate the purchase of Telstra. Telstra is Australia's largest retail operator and buying it would result in NBN Co being in breach of its requirement to remain purely wholesale.

The Government has tried to avoid inhibiting these negotiations by including an exception that allows NBN Co to make acquisitions and gives the company an unspecified amount of time to sell off retail arms in the aftermath.

"The Government's clearly stated policy is that NBN Co is a wholesale-only company," reads the explanatory notes. "However, the Government considers that NBN Co should not be prevented from purchasing telecommunications companies, even if they have retail businesses, if such an acquisition could support the early development and rollout plan of the NBN.

"NBN Co... would need to set in place clear transitional arrangements for divesting any retail operations involved in such acquisitions," the notes read.

"NBN Co will need to notify the Commonwealth of any proposed acquisitions, including acquisition of a significant shareholding, as part of its reporting obligations."


Government to keep a leash on NBN Co
"@rtfmoz Firstly, let me begin by commending you in voicing your opinion and standing up for your government. I really think its great that you can stand up without a care for what anyone thinks. ..."
By Bazwalt
 
 
 
Comments: 12
Perdix
Feb 24, 2010 3:41 PM
So the way this works is;
NBN is a wholesale only company except where the minister thinks it would be neat to sell retail
NBN can buy retail operations only if it agrees to sell down within 5 years, unless the minister thinks it would be neat to keep the retail arm.
NBN can sell whatever products it wants, unless the minister doesn't like it.

ummm, why does this bother me?
longsword
Feb 24, 2010 3:53 PM
like anything that Conroy has his fingers in, this worries me big time. NBN is not necessary and is a massive waste of government money which they will struggle to get back
listohan
Feb 24, 2010 5:15 PM
longsword: You say the NBN is a massive waster of money. Do you have any evidence or even argument to back that statement up? When you can live opposite a CityRail station and not get ADSL, something is wrong. There is debate going on about Sydney's Barangaroo and transport plans and the graphics are so constrained for slow internet connections, it is a disgrace in the 21st century.
Kaldek
Feb 24, 2010 5:17 PM
longsword: You may feel that way now, but at some point the rest of the world will have similar service to what NBN proposes and people like you will be moaning how the Government hasn't done anything about it.
djzort
Feb 24, 2010 7:12 PM
the promise of an nbn and previously OPEL has all but halted exiting carriers from improving broadband for more than 5 years now.

no one is willing to invest in any fixed line (dsl cable whatever) improvements because they cant prove to themselves or their share holders that it will not become worthless because of NBN.

for example, the OPEL contract was supposed to make major improvements and was well on track to doing so. then labor pulled the plug because the schedule was supposedly late. now in the next election year, the NBN is yet to deliver anything that resembles a working broadband service.

the reality is simply, that the promise of NBN has halted major investment in telecommunications infrastructure at a time when people are screaming for it more than ever before.

the current lack of interest in private investments can be blamed purely on labor promises and their inability to deliver on them.

lets pray liberal wins the next election and unequivocally cancels the NBN, so that the purses of the existing telcos will be pulled open to start working at filling the 5 year (and growing) technology gap.
sydneyla
Feb 25, 2010 7:19 AM
What a shocking mess from a bunch of amateurs. Senator Conroy and Mr Tanner will run and decide everything. Senator Conroy who can't even answer questions in the Senate without his laptop on which his backroom boys type in the answers for him.

This NBN Co probably will be the greatest and most disastrous white elephant foul-up in Australia's history. It would probably be best for all concerned Telstra, Optus etc to speak out now and avoid results that will destabilize their businesses and wreck their industry.
Bob
Feb 25, 2010 10:28 AM
NBN will fail because no private company is going to invest in a minority shareholding at high risk when all the decisions are being made by someone with clearly no idea.

All that needs to happen for the whole of Australia to have Internet almost immediately, maybe within a year, is for the government say that Telco's don't have provide their assets to their competitors at a discount. In the current arrangement no one will build anything if you have to give it away. You would just do Sydney and Melbourne and move onto the rest of the world if their governments will let you. Most governments (eg Singapore) actually support their locals and tax foreign telcos heavily.

If the free market decided that they could offer products cheaper then they would. They haven't to date in most of Australia. The government could subsidise Telco's (and other businesses) in remote areas.
rtfmoz
Mar 3, 2010 3:32 PM
Conroy is employing a vast amount of resources to chart a course into the future for a national broadband network that puts us in the drivers seat for us and our childrens future and all anyone can seem to do is criticise him and pretend they know better. How about you put the shoe on the other foot for change.

Do you think he is sitting in a room going, oh uh that would be nice. He has the most experienced people in the *COUNTRY* advising him every step of the way. So why is everyone here treating his decisions with a complete lack of respect? There are educated people, far more so than you or me, advising him and helping him chart the course. As for the new provisions...

If *YOU* put 40 billion dollars into something, you think its unreasonable to get something out of it? If any of you took a moment to think about it, you would realise that paying for access to infrastructure which you just implemented is pretty silly, let alone the fact it just wasting taxpayers money.

The decisions being made here are quite logical and make perfect sense to anyone who is willing to take the time to think about it. The media are just drumming up news by over dramatising the entire issue and every one of you are buying into it.
anonymous
Mar 3, 2010 5:51 PM

No, rtfmoz, I think all of Conboy's minders are sitting in a room working out how they can spin the NBN pitch to divert attention from the secret government censorship that Kruddman and Conboy want to impose on us.

The pink batt scandals will be nothing compared to the shit hitting the fan when people realise what the secret filter involves.
sydneyla
Mar 11, 2010 8:11 AM
Oh! rtfmoz are you serious? Today we see reported in the newspapers that $100 million dollars will need to be spent to rectify the amateur and disastrous insulation scheme that was planned and authorised by those "educated people" who you admire. Hey rtfmox I have a little bridge in Sydney that I will sell you cheap. LOL.
sydneyla
Mar 13, 2010 9:11 AM
Late Mail rtfmos worse than we thought. To put right (and you can never put right the four boys who were killed by the insulation bungle) the cost to Australian taxpayers is now expected to go as high as one billion dollars. "Educated people" indeed.
Bazwalt
Apr 21, 2010 1:48 PM
@rtfmoz
Firstly, let me begin by commending you in voicing your opinion and standing up for your government. I really think its great that you can stand up without a care for what anyone thinks. Great work. Those who attacked and criticized you don't deserve a moment of attention.

But, Given Conroys approach to the filter - I've already lost hope and confidence in Conroy and his "educated" team. They have no idea how the internet works and they are completely failing at attempting to implement a workable filter. There are so many technical and moral flaws in their filter that the whole thing needs to be binned.

You say that Conroy is trying to put us in the drivers seat and building the foundations for a better future for our children - but I must point out the the biggest flaw in that statement is that Conroys filter is mandatory but it's not illegal for anyone to circumvent the system?

The youth of today are already intelligent enough - and like always - methods will be shared and allowing them to crack the system isn't going to protect our kids.

Conroy is putting the filter in control of our government and taking us FROM the drivers seat. Parents don't have to lift a finger with the new filter because the ignorant parents will be oblivious to the fact that the system is so easily crackable that it's not making the slightest amount of difference.

Like I said, I commend your efforts in standing up for what you believe in - but Conroy has done enough to make a point of his teams incompetence.

The NBN is a fundamental and necessary advancement in our country's telecommunications network - but it needs to be in an equally controlled environment and untainted by political strain and corruption. I fear that with Conroy in-charge of this...we are headed for an uncertain and uneven playing field.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Vito Forte: A CIO for tough times
Fortescue Metals CIO talks vendor management and innovation.
 
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Vodafone Australia churn nears half a million for 2011
British joint owners 'not pleased'.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  85%
 
No
  15%
TOTAL VOTES: 225

Vote