Conroy moves to avert Do Not Call rego troubles

 

Backflips on business number inclusion.

The Federal Government has moved to scrap the requirement to re-register for the Do Not Call register every three years and to abandon the register's expansion to business numbers.

In a statement, the Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (DBCDE) Stephen Conroy said he would seek amendments to "replace the current registration period with an arrangement that enables the Minister to determine the appropriate registration period."

"Initially, I propose this be set at five years," Senator Conroy said.

"As soon as these amendments come into effect, the numbers of those who registered later in 2007 will not need to be re-registered until 2012."

The news came just one week after iTnews reported that only about 39 per cent of landline phone numbers and 43 percent of mobile phone numbers had been re-registered.

Conroy said the decision was made after "constructive" talks with the Greens. He called on the Opposition to support the amendments.

To facilitate quick passage of the amendments, he said "the Government will not proceed with the proposal to extend the Register to include business numbers in the current legislation."

The Opposition had already stated in March that it would block the planned extension to business numbers.

Shadow Communications Minister Tony Smith branded Conroy's announcement "another Friday afternoon backflip" from the Rudd Government.

"We warned Senator Conroy that his now dumped legislation did not and could not distinguish between telemarketing calls and normal commercial day-to-day business calls," he said in a statement.

He said the Coalition would support extending the registration period, in recognition of "the utter incompetence of the Minister to adequately inform the public about the looming re-registration for home phone numbers."

"Given Senator Conroy seriously sought to legislate such a ridiculous plan one can only imagine the chaos that he is cooking up with his reckless $43 billion National Broadband Network," he said.


Conroy moves to avert Do Not Call rego troubles
"Easy. WE are Conroy's employers. Sack him at the next election! One day, when the rest of the world has Giga-bit communications, we may see the partial opening of our Fibre NBN, but I won't hold ..."
By Pilotyoda
 
 
 
Comments: 5
Mordd
May 1, 2010 7:11 AM
How does changing it from 3 to 5 years equate to scrapping the requirement to re-register??? Am i missing something here or is the author not paying attention?

"The Federal Government has moved to scrap the requirement to re-register for the Do Not Call register every three years"

AND

Stephen Conroy said he would seek amendments to "replace the current registration period with an arrangement that enables the Minister to determine the appropriate registration period."

"Initially, I propose this be set at five years," Senator Conroy said.

How are those two statements reconcible with each other?
Mordd
May 1, 2010 7:11 AM
*reconcilable
JoeSoap
May 1, 2010 11:37 PM
The way I basically see it is another Conroy decision that is at his discretion to what happens in this country. yes Conroy does deserve a good bash since his plans on NBN and Censorship aren't really what I can see is in the country’s best interests. Why for one would the taxpayer pay for a national network to only get it sold at what could possibly be as 25 to 30 year return period in 5 years. He seems to like the 5 year mark maybe his retirement is due then. I maybe narrow minded in my thinking and that's just the way I see it at this point.

utedog
May 2, 2010 12:03 AM
I agree Mordd. Thought I'd look further, but the Minister's website had nothing to add - http://www.minister.dbcde.gov.au/media/media_releases/2010/038. Maybe the key is the bit that says:
'The amendment would replace the current registration period with an arrangement that enables the Minister to determine the appropriate registration period. "Initially, I propose this be set at five years," Senator Conroy said.'
Maybe we are supposed to read between the lines and assume that once the 5 years are up the Minister will again "determine the appropriate registration period" by extending the period further, and thus there is still no need to renew your registration on the DNCR. That's my best guess.
Pilotyoda
May 2, 2010 1:44 PM
Easy.
WE are Conroy's employers. Sack him at the next election!

One day, when the rest of the world has Giga-bit communications, we may see the partial opening of our Fibre NBN, but I won't hold my breath.

Meanwhile, we could have a Fibre NBN owned by the Government (we - the people) with prices set quite low for connection while we still pay our ISP's, etc for access and content. The fee for physical connection should be lower than what Telstra charges on the wholesale market. This would equate to around $8 per month at current population levels - probably no more than your ISP now pays Telstra for access. In other words the same as you now pay with the only new charge being for the Modem. (I can hear Telstra screaming from here.)

The Fibre would be good for over 40 years as the terminal interfaces can be continuously upgraded over time giving higher speeds (just like improvements to DSL have given extended life to the copper now in use).
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Revealed: 2012 e-government award winners
Government highlights projects, professionals of the year.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 480

Vote