Police angry at shift to 800 MHz broadband

 

As the Greens call for Senate probe.

Australia's Police Federation has accused the Government of putting profit before community safety, slamming scoping work to run an emergency services mobile broadband network in the 800 MHz spectrum band.

Attorney-General Robert McClelland and Communications Minister Stephen Conroy this week revealed they would form a steering committee to examine whether 800 MHz spectrum could support the proposed network.

In a sign the issue was heading for a public showdown, Federation president Vince Kelly told iTnews that police commissioners could boycott the committee process.

"Even if they invited us I don't know we'd want to be involved in [a process] which is ultimately avoiding the issue and going to give us a second-best outcome," Kelly said.

"Why would we [the Federation] and commissioners of police want to be involved in [that]?"

Emergency services had asked for a section of prized 700 MHz digital dividend spectrum to be reserved for their network.

The proposal was met with stiff opposition from the commercial telecommunications sector, who want 700 MHz spectrum to launch next-generation Long Term Evolution (LTE) mobile broadband services.

Peak telco bodies were yesterday welcoming of Canberra's attempts to bump the discussion into a different spectral band.

But the Government faced a tough battle convincing emergency services of the merits of 800 MHz – a band the Police Federation had not even considered a distant third or fourth option in a proposal made public late last year.

By setting up a steering committee to "evaluate" 800 MHz, Kelly said the clear message from Government was that they wouldn't reserve any 700 MHz spectrum, despite it being the "clear and obvious" solution to emergency communications needs.

"All the experts on emergency management in this country believe 700 MHz is the immediate solution – it's available and should simply be reserved," Kelly said.

"The argument [for 700 MHz] has been clearly articulated by the police commissioners, [the Federation] and the peak body representing fire and ambulance services.

"The Government should not put profit and the telcos ahead of community safety."

Kelly said that arguments that 800 MHz was a regional standard for emergency communications weren't correct.

And he was critical of Conroy and McClelland for attempting to make a decision themselves rather than submitting the emergency services proposal to cabinet.

"It should be considered by the entire Government," Kelly said.

The prospect of wider involvement in a decision on the issue became more certain overnight as interest in the issue shifted to the minor parties.

Greens Senator Scott Ludlam told a Senate debate on the digital dividend last night that the party wanted to take bills associated with the dividend "to the committee stage" to provide an opportunity to probe Conroy over the emergency services allocation.

"We understand the Government is still considering whether or not to reserve part of the digital dividend in the 700 MHz band for police and emergency services, and if so how that will be organised," Ludlam said.

"I will indicate now I have a number of questions with regard to this issue and a couple of others, and that I will be proposing that we take this bill into the committee stage so that we can debate some of these issues with the Minister."

Ludlam referred to an Access Economics report commissioned by the Attorney-General that was said to conclude that profits from the 700 MHz spectrum auction would not be adversely affected by giving away a 20 MHz block to emergency services.

"I understand that the Attorney has a report from Access Economics which says that setting aside 20 MHz of spectrum for natural disasters may not reduce the proceeds from auction because of the scarcity value of the spectrum," Ludlam said.

"In effect, [reserving a 20 MHz block] decreases the amount that is available for bidding, which has been described as the waterfront property of radio spectrum."

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Police angry at shift to 800 MHz broadband
"I believe the issue with 700Mhz vs 800Mhz is that 700Mhz has a higher penetration range on structures, plus in wide open areas (ie: rural areas) it has a longer range. This would facilitate ..."
By RaTTyRaTT
 
 
 
Comments: 4
davmel
May 12, 2011 6:28 PM
The APF should shut up and get to the back of the queue behind all the other users of spectrum.
Ripping out 20 MHz from what will ultimately be the most popular and useful LTE band for general mobile internet use for the exclusive use of one organisation would be an absolute tragic waste of spectrum.
So a handful of cops in each region get exclusive use for a large block of spectrum to send a few videos or photos occasionally whilst denying THOUSANDS of tax paying public mobile internet users the ability to use that spectrum to its absolute maximum limit 24/7!
GET STUFFED COPS!!!!
They have a niche application so they can use a niche non-standard spectrum. The 700 band is being harmonised globally for mobile internet use and that's what it should be exclusively used for in Australia.

Also the BS claim that public safety is being put at risk is just outrageous. Using the 800 band instead of the 700 band is NEVER going to put anyone's life at risk.
It's time the police got totally screwed with their demands because they've been screwing everyone else for far too long. Fancy the arrogant coppers thinking it's ok to police the radio spectrum too!!!
meski
May 12, 2011 7:41 PM
Would the police explain why they believe the 800MHz spectrum is a second-best outcome?

Ludlam is ultimately wrong, in that the 700MHz band less 20MHz is able to support less users. Sure, the government may get paid the same for it, but that's not the point.
laman
May 13, 2011 9:41 AM
What is the problem even if the 800MHz spectrum is a second-best outcome? You can always ask for the best outcome. Live is about compromise, and after reading the articles twice, I still can't see what wrong is the 800MHz spectrum.
RaTTyRaTT
May 13, 2011 11:18 AM
I believe the issue with 700Mhz vs 800Mhz is that 700Mhz has a higher penetration range on structures, plus in wide open areas (ie: rural areas) it has a longer range. This would facilitate better range for emergency services. Also, as it penetrates structures better, this is better for mobile/police services.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 510

Vote