Govt raises 800 MHz prospect for Police broadband

 

Alternative to digital dividend demands.

Emergency services could be given a slice of 800 MHz – not 700 MHz digital dividend – spectrum to build their own mobile broadband network under a new option canvassed by Government and industry officials at a meeting yesterday.

The meeting – spearheaded by Attorney-General Robert McClelland and Communications Minister Stephen Conroy – resolved to form a steering committee to evaluate the 800 MHz band further.

"Discussions centred around the possible ‘earmarking’ of spectrum from the 800 MHz band for potential use by public safety agencies to build their mobile broadband capability," McClelland's office reported.

Updated 12 May: Australia's Police Federation was unreceptive to using the 800 MHz band.

The Federation had never discussed 800 MHz as an option when it originally sought a 20 MHz chunk of the 700 MHz digital dividend to be set aside for its private mobile broadband network.

That proposal [pdf] raised the ire of the mobile telecommunications sector, which eyed the digital dividend as the future of commercial mobile broadband services.

Communications Alliance chief John Stanton warned the CommsDay Summit in March that caving in to Police demands would be a "policy fumble of gothic proportions" that could cost Australia a third commercial LTE network.

Australian Mobile Telecommunications Association chief Chris Althaus called on the Government to convene "urgent talks" to address the issue.

The industry has argued that running emergency services' communication in the 700 MHz band would put Australia out of step with regional counterparts, who ran in the ITU-designated 806-824 MHz and 851-869 MHz ranges.

"Emergency services organisations are asking for the wrong spectrum," Althaus said in a March statement.

Althaus – who attended the government meeting yesterday – welcomed the attempt to refocus Police attention on the 800 MHz band.

"At the end of the day, the fact the spectrum exists and it's entirely suitable for the needs of emergency services has quite legitimately drawn a focus towards 800 MHz as something that should be investigated in detail," Althaus told iTnews.

"There's going to be groups set up to pursue this investigation [of 800 MHz].

"The industry supports this direction fully and is committed to be involved in this body of work. From an industry point of view, we think the government has got the balance right in moving towards this investigation of 800 MHz."

McClelland said yesterday that a steering committee, "co-chaired by the Attorney-General's Department and the Department for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy with senior representatives from public safety agencies, will undertake further work [on 800 MHz] with a view to reporting to the next meeting of the Standing Council on Police and Emergency Services."

He indicated 800 MHz was but one option still on the table.

"The Government is continuing to talk with public safety agencies about their requirements for a reliable and resilient mobile broadband capability," he said.

"A number of options are being considered to provide this key capability and agencies put forward a range of constructive views."

Further comment was being sought from the Attorney-General's office.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Govt raises 800 MHz prospect for Police broadband
"MerariSchroeder wrote: Mobile internet is where the demand is. Sure but that doesnt mean people are giving up their fixed line connections. MerariSchroeder wrote: People travel, mobile ..."
By HubertCumberdale
 
 
 
Comments: 2
MerariSchroeder
May 11, 2011 5:03 PM
Why build a completely separate network for police? This once again highlights the problem of having multiple redundant networks. If anything NBNCo should have been a single wholesale LTE provider (SiWLTEP).

1. All spectrum could be made available to customers, not just a single 20Mhz slice, paving the way for LTE-A and beyond.
2. There could be "one" network of towers with practically 100% coverage.
3. Police are just one user and can be given QoS benefits at base stations.

Slicing up the wireless spectrum is wasteful. It means there will be a wasteful amount of overlap, each network trying gain a ROI meaning higher prices relative to a SiWLTEP solution. There will also be less peak speed available to customers. Dumb.

Mobile internet is where the demand is. People travel, mobile Internet uptake is rapidly increasing, everyone has a mobile phone. Why are we building a centralised NBN where there is no demand? Why is the mobile internet space being neglected, where there IS demand? Dumb.
HubertCumberdale
May 11, 2011 5:30 PM
MerariSchroeder wrote:
Mobile internet is where the demand is.

Sure but that doesnt mean people are giving up their fixed line connections.

MerariSchroeder wrote:
People travel, mobile Internet uptake is rapidly increasing, everyone has a mobile phone.

Sure but that doesnt mean people are giving up their fixed line connections.

MerariSchroeder wrote:
Why are we building a centralised NBN where there is no demand?

Because there actually is a demand and wireless solutions are pathetically slow and cannot keep up with speeds achieved on fibre... I thought this was obvious, most people can figure this stuff out on their own.

MerariSchroeder wrote:
Why is the mobile internet space being neglected, where there IS demand?

Cant the private market take care of it? No wait, what I'm asking is why isn't the private market taking care of it? No wait, I actually dont care...

MerariSchroeder wrote:
Dumb.

Certainly is.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 510

Vote