Internode warns of NBN backhaul cartel

 

Compromise will be "bad for everyone".

The Federal Government has been accused of putting Telstra and Optus' interests ahead of its ambition for the NBN to create a "level playing field",as debate raged on points of interconnection (POI) to the next-generation network.

Points of interconnect are the places where NBN Co will hand over traffic carried on its network to an access seeker's [ISP] network.

NBN Co has proposed 14 aggregation POIs in the capital cities. The proposal was met with concerns from the competition watchdog and backhaul providers, who said it could isolate their fibre assets.

But the managing director of ISP Internode Simon Hackett spoke out in support of the 14 POI model overnight.

He criticised rumoured attempts by the Government to "average" the different extremes being touted by NBN Co and industry critics, arguing it would be "akin to the classic mistake in politics of choosing the average between two opposing views instead of being brave enough to make an appropriate decision."

Hackett said that a mandated compromise between 14 and 200 POIs "would suit neither opposing POI camp.

"The outcome would be bad for everyone," Hackett said.

"It would 'half fix' the commercial drivers of the big guys, while 'half hurting' everyone else. Permanently. And in a way that may be impossible to fix later on."

Hackett argued that the "many POI" model would concentrate power in the hands of Telstra and Optus, potentially leading to "cartel" behaviour and prices.

"They [Telstra and Optus] will permanently have their fingers in the value chain of everyone else in the industry - something the NBN was intended to avoid - by charging all the other RSPs [retail service providers] to reach the NBN POIs via their fibre backbones," Hackett said.

"Because there will be very few of the big players, the access pricing to access the NBN POIs will tend toward cartel behaviour  - a high price with no economic driver toward reducing it over time.

"The commercial interests of Telstra and Optus appear, disturbingly, to be more important to the government than keeping the NBN playing field level."

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Internode warns of NBN backhaul cartel
"I agree with Simon on one simple point -- my current backhaul to syd pop is via Optus - it sucks and if it wasn't for the cheap (and nasty) price i would be on a Telstra backhauled port. If the ..."
By ssaammss
 
 
 
Comments: 4
umbria
Dec 20, 2010 4:38 PM
Simon's absolutely right. The technically optimal solution is two redundant POIs in each capital city. This minimises network routing complexity, reduces risk points of failure, eliminates possible increased latency to regional areas, eliminates the $200 million construction and operational costs of 106 extra regional POIs. Yet it provides every ISP a local POI to their network, whichever capital city/ies they happen to be in.

As for the whinging third party fibre owners, they will still get revenue streams from their existing lucrative VPN customers such as government departments, corporations and retail chains, and can lease their fibre trunks to NBNCo as well.

As a taxpayer/investor in the NBN, I want to fund the optimal technical solution for the lowest possible cost, and that means 14 POIs.

Maintain the rage, Simon.
packet
Dec 20, 2010 5:10 PM
Capital city POIs are fine if all you want is internet services, but what about regional vpn services?
PeteJ
Dec 20, 2010 7:48 PM
Internode as with many of the mid level players made their money by competing in low hanging areas (high density environments). All Simon HackJob wants is the entire country to become low hanging and doesn't want to pay based on the true cost of delivering a service; he claims to fight for even and fair services but I have never seen him make a comment unless it is in his own financial interest. It also explains why he has never invested in delivering his own infrastructure outside of major cities.

Providing a PoI for every 100,000 services on average is a solid and logical call. I don't often agree with the ACCC but this is a good call.
ssaammss
Dec 21, 2010 10:18 PM
I agree with Simon on one simple point -- my current backhaul to syd pop is via Optus - it sucks and if it wasn't for the cheap (and nasty) price i would be on a Telstra backhauled port.

If the NBN Co did regional POI and it was awarded completely to Telstra (or anyone competent, except for give-me-a-govt-handout-to-install-backhaul-optus-ala-opel) i would be content.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 510

Vote