iiNet, Internode, MacTel circling new backhaul links

Dec 4, 2009 2:18 PM
Tags: iinet | internode | macquarie | telecom | nextgen | networks | nbn | blackspot | backhaul | conroy

Predicted capacity will be quickly soaked up.

ISPs iiNet, Internode, Adam and Macquarie Telecom will look to offer services to some or all of the 100 regional towns that will benefit from the Government's $250m backhaul blackspots scheme.

All welcomed the contract awarded to Nextgen Networks by the Communications Minister Stephen Conroy at an event in Sydney today.

iiNet's chief technology officer Greg Bader said iiNet would look to build business cases to offer services in all locations opened up by the 6,000 kilometre fibre deployment.

He said the availability of competitive links could tip DSLAM investments in those locations over the line, but he said he did not have any commercial information on access costs and timelines.

"It's great news something is happening," he said.

"I wish it were 1,000 towns.

"The fact that it's Nextgen building is fine by us. We're pleased to see Darwin in there because it's been horrible in terms of competitive transmission out of the place."

Bader also said iiNet was "more than keen" to get access to the Geraldton link in Western Australia.

"As soon as we know some dates we're good to go," he said.

Internode managing director Simon Hackett labeled the announcement "an exciting development for us and for consumers.

"We look forward to learning more from NextGen now that they're allowed to talk to us about this - so we can figure out how to engage with them on these newly announced paths," he said.

"We're a major customer of Nextgen already, so I would expect in the future to be taking up even more services with them under appropriate commercial arrangements."

Macquarie Telecom also confirmed in a statement that it was "set to expand its services into these towns" named by the Federal Government and Nextgen.

"We fully expect to expand our services in the towns that will offer real, wholesale choice," said the telco's national executive for government and regulatory Matt Healy.

"It beggars belief that, prior to today's announcement, a town the size of Darwin had one internet link provider to the rest of Australia and the world. It will be the first time that the six towns identified will benefit from real competition and the freedom to choose from more than one provider."

Healy believed the extra capacity would "be quickly soaked up".

"Any arguments that the new networks are an unnecessary duplication of existing infrastructure fail the reality test," Healy said.

"Such claims are either made to protect blatant self-interest or are ignorant of the poor state of broadband in many Australian regions."

Adam Internet managing director Scott Hicks welcomed the Victor Harbor link.

"The area out south has always been incredibly expensive," he said.

"We've been trying to do something in that area for quite some time. It's always been a goal to enable some sort of WiMAX or DSLAM solution out there. Telstra is the only option [now] and their rates are ridiculously expensive."


  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
iiNet, Internode, MacTel circling new backhaul links
"What is it about the concept of an independently operated NBN backbone that you don't understand, Bob? There is no question of "offering it to your competitors" because the network should be ..."
 
 
Comments: 5
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
zag
Dec 5, 2009 1:44 AM
I surely hope this isn't going to be the case with everything from now on.

In that these "ISP"s just wait for someone else to pay for a cable to be laid out to somewhere and then claim to be leaders in providing net access to these areas when they havn't put in any cash towards the laying of the cable.
rycrozier
Dec 5, 2009 9:55 AM
I don't think they're saying that at all. Isn't the idea of an open access wholesale model that anyone can gain access? If anything the fact so many ISPs are willing to join should be a good thing for people living in those communities - more choice, price competition etc...
ace-den
Dec 9, 2009 7:36 AM
Typical Telcos.

They wait for government handouts to roll out their network
Bob
Dec 9, 2009 9:46 AM
That's the reality of the stupid legislation. No one wants to be first or you have to offer it to your competitors. So no one invests in Australia. Dumb. Every competitor with services in Sydney and Melbourne should be forced to provide fixed services in a designated rural area.
anonymous
Dec 9, 2009 5:35 PM
What is it about the concept of an independently operated NBN backbone that you don't understand, Bob? There is no question of "offering it to your competitors" because the network should be available to every ISP/CSP on the same terms.

Bit hard for an old Telstra droid to comprehend, perhaps.
Comment:
Want to participate in the discussion?
Or log in now to comment
 
 
 
Top Stories
Oracle shuts down open source test servers
Playing nice with the open source community, Larry?
 
Google hosts election debate
Lundy, Fletcher and Ludlam face off on tech policies.
 
Telstra fined $18.5m for exchange access
Kept competitive DSLAM kit out.
 

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
"Now Julia, if only you would promise not to filter the internet in your next term of government ..."
by hsvandrew Jul 31, 2010 9:33 AM
 
"@Nate - my fears are that if we use a national consortium as an interface to international ..."
by heavenlyhaloes Jul 31, 2010 12:41 AM
 
"Did anybody notice that on Apple's website the iPhone is missing the AT&T logo on the top bar? ..."
by brownenicola Jul 30, 2010 10:18 PM
 
"@digger11 - when will you learn just to remain quiet when you don't have all the facts or a ..."
by Bazwalt Jul 30, 2010 7:13 PM
 
"Wakie is right, Digger11 is either an exceptional forum troll or a massive moron. For those who ..."
by Bazwalt Jul 30, 2010 6:51 PM
Polls
Did Google breach the Telecommunications Interception or Privacy Acts during its WiFi wardrive?

   |   View results
Yes. There is no excuse for collecting this data.
  28%
 
No. If your wireless network is unsecured, you have no right to complain
  72%
TOTAL VOTES: 1873

Vote