Nextgen wins $250m NBN backhaul project

 

100 regional towns get high-speed ADSL in 18 months.

View larger image
Nextgen Networks will build all six backhaul links under the Government's $250 million blackspot ...
View larger image
Wall King, CEO Leighton Holdings with Senator Conroy in Sydney today.
View larger image
The Broken Hill link contains 35 backbone access points and will address a population of 137,400 ...

See all pictures here »

Nextgen Networks will build all six backhaul links under the Government's $250 million blackspot scheme, connecting 100 regional towns to high-speed broadband in just 18 months (see maps in gallery right).

At an event in Sydney today, Communications Minister Stephen Conroy inked the deal with the Leighton Holdings-owned network builder following a competitive tender.

Conroy said the "priority investment" will put 6,000 kilometres of fibre in the ground, benefiting more than 395,000 people in 100 regional communities.

The number of towns to benefit under the Nextgen proposal was significantly higher than the previous announcements of blackspot locations - Geraldton in Western Australia, Darwin, Emerald and Longreach in Queensland, Broken Hill in NSW, Victor Harbor in South Australia and South West Gippsland in Victoria.

Conroy said the "overall package in terms of where they were able to reach" had put Nextgen in the driver's seat for the project.

"It was their capacity to build beyond the original tender... in reaching 100 regional centres which is obviously more than [the initial] six," Conroy said.

Nextgen indicated that the Geraldton, Victor Harbor and Gippsland links would be completed first. These could be operational in as little as a year.

"The two areas that will take longer are Emerald/Longreach to Darwin and Broken Hill-Mildura-Shepparton," the Nextgen spokesman said.

Conroy said he expected all six links to be completed "in 18 months". He said construction would create 1,000 direct jobs.

Leighton Holdings chief Wal King said the construction efforts would inject money into the regional economy.

But he warned regional areas they could face some disruption during the construction phase.

"Unfortunately when we do build things they have some disruption. We'll work as hard as we can with the communities to [minimise it]," King said.

Preliminary work on the six links was underway and construction would begin shortly, Conroy said.

Route details

The Government released a series of maps and indicative route details for the backhaul links at the launch today.

The Darwin-Emerald-Longreach fibre will run over 3,835 kilometres and feature 42 backbone access points along the route. It will cost $125.5 million.

The Broken Hill link will cover 1137 kilometres with 35 backbone access points along the way, at a cost of $70.7 million.

The Geraldton link will run 426 kilometres, include six backbone access points and cost $24.9 million to build.

Victor Harbor's link covers 129 kilometres and nine access points at a cost of $12.6 million, and the South West Gippsland link will run for 215 kilometres, covering 10 access points and costing $15.9 million.

Read the reactions of Australian ISPs to the announcement here.


"."
By brencarroll
 
 
 
Comments: 18
kwilla
Dec 4, 2009 2:37 PM
What the...?!!

According to that map there's already a major competetive backbone reaching Cairns. Why in the name of all that's holy isn't anybody using it???!!!!
MerariSchroeder
Dec 4, 2009 5:13 PM
I think the blue lines are existing, red lines are proposed. There are no red lines going to Cairns.
Rossyduck
Dec 4, 2009 5:14 PM
Why in all thats holy do people now want to put ADSL in these towns. Break out of current preconceptions and rather install GPON systems in the towns. All it takes is one roadside cabinet and around $140000 for the fibre and ONT's.
MerariSchroeder
Dec 4, 2009 5:16 PM
Good to see some real progress. At least they can have ADSL2+ while Conroy sorts himself out concerning the NBN plan (which is currently not feasible).
Borgscan
Dec 4, 2009 7:02 PM
It's good to see some positive comments from you, Merari.

Since the government is paying for this backhaul, does that mean it'll automatically/seamlessly get transfered to the NBN?

I don't understand the ownership.
zag
Dec 5, 2009 1:51 AM
It's got nothing to do with putting DSL into these towns it'll be a backbone test of fiber and then a test of rolling out DSL2+ connections, which is what the NBN really is.

People thinking they are going to get a 1000MBPS fiber connection for $10 a month are living in lala land.

Oh well break up Telstra and just wait for years and decades for some Gov Dept to get it's head out of rolling paper work and time wasting before anything NBN get rolled out.
anonymous
Dec 5, 2009 12:53 PM
And now a bit of reality, zag 01:51.

In all the talk about the NBN, nobody apart from you has ever referred to the possibility of getting 1Gig for ten bucks a month. You better go back to the Telstra cafeteria and have another cup of cocoa.
sydneyla
Dec 7, 2009 8:05 AM
When are the Australian people going to see a cost analysis and a proposed return on investment of the proposed NBN?
Maxxi
Dec 7, 2009 9:09 AM
@sydneyla : Telcos can only write a costs benefit analysis when they they have the relevant data.
Bob
Dec 7, 2009 9:18 AM
Wow, 6 links of old DSL technology in 18mths. Didn't Telstra put the Next G network over the entire country in 10 mths?
anonymous
Dec 7, 2009 11:29 AM
@Bob, you've been believing your own spin and hype again.

Telstra did not put NextG over the whole country in 10 months. I understand the coverage is less than twenty percent of the country, and it took longer than 10 months.

There is also a slight difference between converting an existing mobile network (much of it paid for by taxpayers) to another system, and building a fibre backbone from scratch.
Bob
Dec 7, 2009 2:57 PM
Actually anonymous, 99% of the population covered by Next G completed in 10 months and it wasn't paid for by taxpayers. The areas quoted here are not remote.
Desk
Dec 7, 2009 4:35 PM
So Bob was it the entire country in 10 months or was it 99% of the population in 10 months? There is a MASSIVE difference between those 2 situations!
Ewok
Dec 7, 2009 4:43 PM
Desk, I very highly doubt that next g actually covers 99% of the population. The reason they don't say %100 is because they know they are WELL short of even 99%. It's a legallity, it's like companies sticking "Kill's 99% of bacteria etc" on cleaning products, they know that if that 1% for some reason is proven wrong, they can't be sued for it because it's only 1%. If you have a look at telstra's next g footprint, then you will see that only about 1/4 of the entireity of australia is covered. Hardly 99%. It's all marketing, smoke and mirrors and dribble. As for nextgen getting in on the backhaul project? Well, we're all screwed. They're technical division is rife with incompetents judging from personal experience. Meanwhile, it's about time someone did something to provide a larger fiber network in this god-forsaken country.
umbria
Dec 7, 2009 5:33 PM
@Bob: 'The areas quoted here are not remote.' Since when were Tennant Creek and Mount Isa metropolitan suburbs?

This $250m is a great start to getting some decent fibre backhaul into great swathes of the nation that have no way of supporting broadband of any kind at present.

Regardless of whether the end users are connecting on copper, fibre or wirelessly, their connection must still go via a local node with high-speed backhaul capability.

Think of all the schools, hospitals and libraries in the 100 towns on these routes, not just the businesses and family homes, and it is a no-brainer to do this.
Bob
Dec 8, 2009 9:32 AM
You need to travel west of Parramatta umbria. Australia is mainly desert, however Tennant Creek and Mount Isa are on national tarred highways. Places like Gove/Nhulunbuy are remote and they are getting or already have Telstra fibre. You can watch Foxtel at Pooncarie on the Darling but you can't make a phone call unless you are on Telstra. That's reality. If it wasn't for "regulation" the whole country would have fast broadband years ago.
umbria
Dec 8, 2009 5:12 PM
256K is not fast broadband, Bob, and Sol's bullying ensured that is all the majority of Australian households are still running, with $150 per GB excess charges and their children consequently scared of the parent's wrath for doing their homework research online.

No, if it wasn't for governments greedily selling the physical infrastructure to one private corporation we might have seen wider penetration of broadband, and that would have helped Telstra shareholders too.

It was failure to regulate normal business profit-seeking that caused the American banking system collapse, so regulation is not the problem here.

Anyway, it's good to see fibre finally being laid along these tarred rural highways, from which feeders can then run to more remote centres. (I don't visit Sydney much these days, by the way.)
brencarroll
Dec 11, 2009 3:56 PM
.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Windows 8: Under the hood
Part One of iTnews' enterprise guide to Windows 8.
 
iTnews on tour: The Executive Summit Series
Join us in Sydney and Melbourne to meet Australia's tech leaders.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  95%
 
No
  5%
TOTAL VOTES: 19

Vote