NBN expert panellist wants more talk on wireless

 

Expert panellist calls for more talk on 10 percent of NBN.

Former NBN expert panellist Reginald Coutts has called on the Government and NBN Co to state a clear position on how they expect to serve the 10 percent of Australians not receiving a fibre-to-the-home connection under the NBN plan.

Speaking with iTnews, Coutts expressed concerns that the question of the "last ten percent" had all but disappeared from public commentary.

In particular, Coutts expressed concern that NBN Co had given "no indication" as to what type of backhaul it intends to use to service wireless connections in regional Australia.

“I’m concerned about the backhaul issue,” Coutts said. “Because a key part of ensuring people in the 10 percent area of Australia get potentially equivalent services and prices to the rest of Australia [requires] a thorough discussion about backhaul.

“The problem at the moment is ... they’re thinking of it as backhaul links,” Coutts said.

Coutts commended the Federal Government on making a number of "excellent" decisions to fund the provision of additional backhaul links in regional Australia, but he said it remained “unclear” as to whether there was “any strategy of how to address the whole network”.

“It's not this link and that link," he said. "It's how they all come together so that [whether] you're in Darwin, Hobart or Mildura, a service provider could connect into the network at equivalent pricing to someone in Melbourne or Sydney,” Coutts said, referring to Senator Conroy's stated ambition for the NBN Co to provide uniform wholesale pricing.

Coutts believed microwave technology was better suited than optical backhaul for the last 10 percent.

But he conceded optical technology made sense for the links for which the Federal Government has already announced funding.

"It depends on the amount of traffic," he said.

Cross subsidisation confusion

Coutts was also irritated by a “degree of difference” between NBN Co CEO Mike Quigley and the Minister for Broadband, Senator Stephen Conroy - the latter having an "ambition" to offer wholesale uniform pricing across fibre, wireless and satellite connections, the former dismissing such ambitions as impractical.

Coutts said he was more aligned to the Minister's stated ambition than to the vision Quigley gave Senate Estimates.

“For someone in telecommunications, and I’ve got immense respect for Mike [Quigley], to say they’re not considering cross subsidies - I’d have to say, you know, you have to be joking,” Coutts said.

“I’ve obviously got, having been part of deliberations of the previous process for twelve months, some ideas of how that could be done. But I’m not part of government, I’m not part of NBN Co and of course they’re keeping their own private council so to speak,” Coutts said. "And for the first time I’m saying there needs to be some public discussion about this.

"It can’t just be something cooked up in a back room," he said.

Coutts said there were a number of different ways to approach cross subsidisation.

"It comes down to looking at how much you would need to increase pricing by in the cities," Coutts said.

He said he knew there was “a lot of thinking going on” around how to keep prices equivalent across the nation but said the government’s thinking and NBN Co’s thinking was not as “productive as it needs to be”.


NBN expert panellist wants more talk on wireless
"This works as long as NBN Co. is a government protected monopoly. Else, a competitor could build and sell access in dense metro areas cheaper - and neglect the regional/rural areas. Personally, ..."
By RDEFCON1
 
 
 
Comments: 6
MerariSchroeder
Oct 24, 2009 9:36 AM
If you cross subsidise costs between metro and rural. The metro costs will go even higher and make urban FTTP connection even less competative against even older technology like 3G and ADSL. With LTE you're going to see a strong contender for competition, and price is where LTE will have the upperhand in this price sensitive market.
deonast
Oct 24, 2009 3:14 PM
MerariSchroeder - don't forget though that extra costs for 10% rural connections with subsidies would be spread amongst 90% from metro areas which may not work out too bad. It all depends on how much extra it will cost to service rural areas which sadly we haven't seen any cost estimates for yet.
Maxxi
Oct 24, 2009 3:18 PM
Hi MerariSchroeder. I think that the potential 2%-3% rise in metro FTTP costs from approx. $50-$80 to approx. $51.50 - $82.40 are not unreasonable.

I am prepared to pay that extra.

We were told that the rise in costs to introduce ADSL2+ would make it uncompetitive.

Tell us, did that ever happen?
Bob
Oct 26, 2009 9:23 AM
We already have wireless broadband to 99% of the pop through Telstra Next G because they invested money and have built backhaul.

There is limited ADSL or anything in the bush because competitors won't put it in as it's easier to just do CBD areas. The only reason DinosaurSL is "competive" is below cost access from Telstra.

If Optus and co haven't built any infrastructure in 15 years, why would they start now and who will invest money in NBN following the attack on Telstra assets.

NBN Co just doesn't stack up.
RDEFCON1
Oct 26, 2009 10:26 AM
This works as long as NBN Co. is a government protected monopoly.

Else, a competitor could build and sell access in dense metro areas cheaper - and neglect the regional/rural areas.

Personally, I'd rather the lower prices driven by true competition based on competitive infrastructure - in place of any guarantee of equivalent but uncompetitive prices across metro and rural areas.
RDEFCON1
Oct 26, 2009 10:26 AM
This works as long as NBN Co. is a government protected monopoly.

Else, a competitor could build and sell access in dense metro areas cheaper - and neglect the regional/rural areas.

Personally, I'd rather the lower prices driven by true competition based on competitive infrastructure - in place of any guarantee of equivalent but uncompetitive prices across metro and rural areas.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Revealed: 2012 e-government award winners
Government highlights projects, professionals of the year.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 480

Vote