Wikipedia shuts out link spammers

 

'Nofollow' tags added to external links.

Wikipedia has started to instruct search engines to ignore links on its pages which point to external websites. 

The user-created encyclopaedia has started to include 'nofollow' tags in all external links.

This prevents the links from being spidered by search engines, or used to determine a website's popularity by mechanisms such as Google's PageRank. 

Wikipedia took the action in response to a search engine optimisation contest in which webmasters were challenged to gain the highest ranking with major search engines for the query 'Global warming awareness 2007'.

One of the contestants created a spam entry on Wikipedia which included a link to his own webpage.

The 'nofollow' tag was first introduced by companies providing blogging services in an effort to curb the flow of spam links in comments on blogs. 

Brion Vibber, a Web developer who works on Wikipedia, announced the changes in an email to a Wikipedia developer email list on Saturday. 

He suggested that the block was a temporary measure and called on developers to create a better way to filter out spam links using heuristics or manual flagging.

Wikipedia's enormous popularity, and the fact that any user can add and edit content, has made it an attractive target for spammers.

While obvious misstatements are typically caught quickly, less obvious ones can remain unnoticed for long periods of time.

Some encyclopaedia authors applauded the move as an effective measure to curb spammers, but it drew criticism from others.

Business author Nicholas Carr said on his blog that the external links provide a way to 'give back' to site builders who provide useful information because the link allows them to improve their online reputation. 

"Although the no-follow move is certainly understandable from a spam-fighting perspective, it turns Wikipedia into something of a black hole on the net. It sucks up vast quantities of link energy but never releases any," he wrote.

Copyright ©v3.co.uk


Wikipedia shuts out link spammers
 
 
 
Top Stories
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
Telstra hands over copper, HFC in new $11bn NBN deal
Value of 2011 deal remains intact.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  38%
 
Your insurance company
  4%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  3%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  19%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1890

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?