Feds propose Open Document Format support

 

Use of other formats not precluded.

The office of the Australian Government Chief Technology Officer (AGCTO) is proposing support for the Open Document Format (ODF) in an annual review of computing system policies.

The review covers the common and standard operating environments (COE/SOE) for client computing systems across federal government, AGCTO John Sheridan said in a blog post.

"The new draft now requires that office productivity suites must provide support for at least version 1.1 of the Open Document Format for Office Applications (ODF) as defined by ISO/IEC 26300:2006/Amd 1:2012," he said.

ODF is the standard Extended Mark-up Language (XML) document format used by governments in many countries, including Japan, India, the European Union, Brazil and South Korea as well as the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation defence pact.

It is supported by commercial vendors such as Microsoft with its Office suites since version 2007 Service Pack 2, and Lotus Symphony, Oracle Staroffice and Google Docs.

Open source software such as AbiWord, OpenOffice, and LibreOffice also support the format.

Interoperability and support for several versions of Microsoft Office is cited by the AGCTO as reasons to go with ODF, along with flexibility and the fact that the format is continously updated and developed.

Spreadsheet formulae are now included in the ODF 1.2 specification as well and the AGTO believes that this, along with Microsoft Office 2013 supporting the format, will help to reliably transfer formulae between applications.

The AGCTO isn't shutting the door on other standards and notes that "defining a common format to be supported by all office productivity suites does not preclude the use of other formats".

Together with the draft COE policy, the AGCTO released (pdf) an updated standard operating environment build which is based on 64-bit Windows 7 with Internet Explorer 10 as the standard browser.

Microsoft's Office appears to be the preferred productivity suite according to the SOE build draft document.

Tweaks and software outside the specification are explicitly not allowed under the draft policy.

"Do not install any form of “value adding” software, such as browser toolbars or helpers, unless they are explicitly required. Where they are automatically installed, but not required, take remedial action to remove or permanently disable them," the draft policy said.

The updated policy will be taken to the government chief information officer committee for review and to the secretaries' ICT governance board for approval after feedback and a final overview of the document.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Feds propose Open Document Format support
John Sheridan, Australian government chief technology officer.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Windows 10 lands in Australia
Campaign to get business to upgrade kicks off.
 
NSW to build its own myGov
Service NSW digital profiles available by September.
 
Android bug leaves a billion phones open to attack
Hackers only need phone number to target devices.
 
 
John Sheridan, Australian government chief technology officer.
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
The 5 Windows 10 privacy issues you should be aware of
Jul 31, 2015
There are a few unsettling details when it comes to Windows 10 privacy
Windows 10 is here! (For some)
Jul 29, 2015
Delivery of the free upgrade versions of Windows 10 began today - have you got yours yet?
Microsoft reveals Microsoft Send, a new enterprise chat app to rival Slack
Jul 27, 2015
Microsoft Send is MSN Messenger for grownups, and you could be using it at work very soon
Developers offered $500,000 grants to find HoloLens uses
Jul 8, 2015
Can augmented-reality end up in business?
Microsoft Tossup: The planning app for unorganised groups of friends
Jul 8, 2015
App allows friends to research venues, vote on plans and chat. And depending on how you run your ...
Latest Comments
Polls
Should law enforcement be able to buy and use exploits?



   |   View results
Yes
  14%
 
No
  51%
 
Only in special circumstances
  17%
 
Yes, but with more transparency
  18%
TOTAL VOTES: 776

Vote