NBN Co denies Telstra favoured in 'early access' expansion

 

Addresses concerns of AAPT, iiNet and Optus.

NBN Co has denied its plan to open 82 partially-built fibre areas to retail service providers will favour Telstra over other ISPs.

The network builder is attempting to create a second phase for its 'early access program', which allows retail internet services to be sold in portions of fibre serving area modules (FSAMs) that are still under construction.

NBN Co is pursuing the expansion of the 'early access program' as it seeks to boost the number of retail subscribers on the network in the lead-up to the September election.

Analysis by iTnews this week confirmed a number of the 82 FSAMs are adjacent to areas already experiencing high take-up rates for NBN services.

The plan requires regulatory approval but is in doubt over concerns raised by iiNet, Optus and AAPT late last week.

AAPT said it was concerned the plan favoured Telstra over other access seekers. Though one of AAPT's concerns was the lack of notice, it said more broadly smaller players may simply be unable to justify the overhead costs of entering all the new areas to service only a portion of premises.

NBN Co denied its plan amounted to "discriminatory conduct ... in favour of Telstra".

"While NBN Co recognises that some Access Seekers may choose not to take advantage of the early release of some, or all, of the additional 82 FSAMs, this will be a consequence of the commercial decisions of individual Access Seekers," the company said. (pdf)

NBN Co also argued that AAPT and others have had plenty of time to gear up to sell into the 82 FSAMs.

It sent ISPs an "account bulletin" on February 19 noting an expansion of the program was "being considered" and listing the proposed FSAMs.

NBN Co also sought to allay the concerns of Optus and iiNet, both of which said they did not understand the rationale for an ambiguous alteration to regulatory documents that is required in order for the program's expansion to proceed.

NBN Co said without the alteration, it would not be able to open any part of the FSAM to ISPs until construction in the area is 90 percent complete.

Update 25/4: This story originally stated that opening any partially-built FSAM would trigger the 18-month countdown for the disconnection of copper services in that area, and that if NBN Co succeeds in having the 82 FSAMs declared Initial Release Rollout Regions (IRRRs), the company could arbitrarily set the disconnection commencement date, rather than have it trigger automatically when the area starts servicing retail customers. This was incorrect.

Regardless of whether or not an FSAM is declared an IRRR, NBN Co must wait for the 90 percent trigger before it can set the disconnection commencement date. 

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


NBN Co denies Telstra favoured in 'early access' expansion
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australia's leaders agree to end GST-free online goods
Gerry Harvey may finally get his way.
 
Cray to build Australia's biggest supercomputer
$77m for 'gamechanger' hardware.
 
Inside CenITex's years of tumult
CEO determined to earn the hearts, minds and servers of Vic govt.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
Microsoft reveals Microsoft Send, a new enterprise chat app to rival Slack
Jul 27, 2015
Microsoft Send is MSN Messenger for grownups, and you could be using it at work very soon
Developers offered $500,000 grants to find HoloLens uses
Jul 8, 2015
Can augmented-reality end up in business?
Microsoft Tossup: The planning app for unorganised groups of friends
Jul 8, 2015
App allows friends to research venues, vote on plans and chat. And depending on how you run your ...
Windows 10 drops 29 July... but only for some
Jul 6, 2015
If you've reserved your copy of Windows 10 and are keenly awaiting its 29 July release, don't ...
Xerocon is heading to Melbourne!
Jul 1, 2015
We're not saying Xero is our FAVOURITE or anything, but Xero's 2015 Xerocon conference is being ...
Latest Comments
Polls
Should law enforcement be able to buy and use exploits?



   |   View results
Yes
  14%
 
No
  51%
 
Only in special circumstances
  16%
 
Yes, but with more transparency
  19%
TOTAL VOTES: 657

Vote