Google offers patent amnesty for open source projects

 

Open source software vulnerable to patent trolls.

Google has reasserted its support of open source by pledging it won't sue users, distributors or developers of such software that uses the search engine giant's patents.

Called the Open Patent Non-Assertion Pledge, Google said the promise applies to anyone unless the company is first attacked.

The company is a longstanding champion of open source software and release code under Apache and GNU GPL licenses, Google legal adviser on patents, Duane Valz blogged last week.

However, the patent protections under the comment open source licenses "are limited", Valz says, whereas Google's OPN Pledge apples to any existing and future open-source software that relies on patents covered by the pledge.

Ten patents for the open source MapReduce computing model for large data set processing - developed by Google, are now covered by the OPN Pledge, which the company hopes will serve as a model for the industry.

The United States is currently reviewing its software patent policies, after a sharp increase in costly court cases featuring rights holders suing organisations for intellectual property violations.

An academic study published last year estimated the cost of so-called patent trolls or non-practising entities that own rights, but do not develop software or products themselves, at US$29 billion in 2011 alone.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Google offers patent amnesty for open source projects
 
 
 
Top Stories
IBM denies plans to cut 112k jobs
But admits to further restructuring.
 
ATO investigates 25 tech giants in tax hunt
Prepared to take tax evaders to court.
 
Immigration, Customs restructure IT leadership
Customs CIO promoted into transformation role.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  36%
 
Your insurance company
  5%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  9%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  4%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  18%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  7%
TOTAL VOTES: 2965

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?

   |   View results
I support shutting down the OAIC.
  27%
 
I DON'T support shutting the OAIC.
  73%
TOTAL VOTES: 936

Vote