Want a software patent? Write some code

 

EFF proposes troll-slaying patent reform.

Reform may be on the horizon for software patents in the United States as lobby groups seek to tighten up the criteria for successful applications.

Software patents are aimed at promoting research and development, but the process of registering and protecting patents have become embroiled in controversy over the last decade.

At the heart of the matter are so-called "patent trolls" that do not create products or services, but claim to own the right to the intellectual property behind them in order to sue companies for millions of dollars or force them to take up licensing and royalty deals.

Enforcing patents in general is big business currently. A Boston University study found that US "patent trolls" ended up costing American businesses US$29 billion in 2011.

Even Google, which has so far been reluctant to use patent litigation as weapon has now filed an infringement complaint against UK's BT in a California court.

Seeking an end to patent trolling, online civil liberties lobby group the Electronic Frontier Foundation has made a recommendation to the United States Patent and Trademarks Office (USPTO) that applicants should submit working code with applications.

If that's not possible, line-by-line notes that explain how the code works should accompany patent applications, the EFF recommends. 

If a patent is granted, the EFF says it should be limited to the invention claimed.

The importance of tightening up the criteria for successful patent applications are underscored by new research from the Brookings Institute.

After steadily increasing since the 1980s when the IT industry took off, patent applications are now at record levels, matching the amounts recorded during the Industrial Revolution era.

However, while most of the Industrial Era inventors were blue collar workers, Brookings notes that complex technology is driving applications from people in science, hi-tech, engineering and mathematics fields.

Likewise, Brookings says that eight of the top ten companies granted US patents are in the IT sector, with IBM having the most at 41,560 or 5.3 percent of the total. Microsoft is number two on the list, with most of its patents concerning software.

Australia has allowed software to be patented since 1991. The country looks set to keep it that way despite efforts to exclude software from the patents system.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Want a software patent? Write some code
Sony optical communications glasses patent drawing.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Westpac committed to core banking plan
[Blog post] Now with leadership.
 
The True Cost of BYOD - 2014 survey
Twelve months on from our first study, is BYOD a better proposition?
 
Photos: Unboxing the Magnus supercomputer
Pawsey's biggest beast slots into place.
 
 
Sony optical communications glasses patent drawing.
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
Apple's top MacBook Pro with Retina is now cheaper
Aug 1, 2014
Apple has updated its MacBook Pro range with faster processors and new pricing, including ...
Pass on carbon tax savings, warns ACCC
Jul 24, 2014
The ACCC is warning businesses that supply "regulated goods" to pass on any cost savings ...
Have customers that won't pay debts?
Jul 10, 2014
The ACCC and ASIC have updated their advice when it comes to collecting debts.
Carpet cleaner faces court over online testimonials
Jul 4, 2014
The ACCC has initiated proceedings against A Whistle (1979) Pty Ltd, the franchisor of Electrodry...
You can now get 15GB of free online storage using Microsoft OneDrive
Jun 25, 2014
Cloud storage has reached both the capacity and price where it's a viable alternative to local ...
Latest Comments
Polls
What is delaying adoption of public cloud in your organisation?







   |   View results
Lock-in concerns
  29%
 
Application integration concerns
  3%
 
Security and compliance concerns
  27%
 
Unreliable network infrastructure
  9%
 
Data sovereignty concerns
  22%
 
Lack of stakeholder support
  3%
 
Protecting on-premise IT jobs
  4%
 
Difficulty transitioning CapEx budget into OpEx
  3%
TOTAL VOTES: 1154

Vote