The NSW Attorney General will this week sign an out of court settlement with software vendor Micro Focus, putting an end to a protracted and expensive dispute between the State’s law enforcement services and the software vendor over licenses.
Micro Focus had accused the NSW Police, the NSW Ombudsman, the Police Integrity Commission, Corrective Services NSW and countless other NSW Government agencies of illegally distributing its software for the better part of a decade in a law suit filed in May 2011.
These agencies have progressively signed small settlements with the British software vendor, but the main protagonist NSW Police continued to fight the matter in the Federal Court until late into 2012.
Today iTnews can reveal that NSW Police and the NSW Department of Attorney General and Justice have finally settled out of court with Micro Focus.
Bruce Craig, general manager for Micro Focus Australia said he could confirm that both parties have settled – NSW Police coming to the table shortly before a hearing scheduled for November, 2012 and the state's Attorney General last week.
Regretfully, the details of those settlements were attached to non-disclosure agreements that prevent the software vendor from revealing how much the case cost the taxpayer.
Micro Focus had originally sued NSW Police for $10 million, but upped the damages sought to $12 million in June 2012 after viewing the results of a court-ordered audit of NSW Police systems.
A relieved Craig said he could not name a figure, saying only that the outcome was “more than satisfying” and had “achieved the desired result.”
“It’s done and dusted,” he said. “All agencies are now fundamentally settled, but for some final paperwork.”
TIMELINE: Policing the Police
Read on to learn how the Government lost millions fighting a case it could not win...
Most of the evidence levelled against the NSW Police was presented before the court in mid-2011, with the key KPMG audit released to the parties in early 2012.
While he has the utmost respect for uniformed NSW Police, Craig was bitterly disappointed the office that runs it was prepared to engage in such a long and costly battle.
He laments that the NSW Government ever agreed to fight the case in court, and further feels the case could have been wound up faster – and at lower cost – should the NSW Police or other senior stakeholders appeared at the hearings, rather than leaving all the work to their lawyers.
(The law firms, incidentally, were arguably two of the best Intellectual Property firms in the business – Clayton Utz and Gilbert and Tobin. The total cost of 18 months of litigation could have totalled as much as $2 million - $4 million).
“The State Government, as I understand it, is supposed to act as a model litigant – to behave in a way that is beyond reproach,” Craig said. “It was disappointing that we didn’t see that in their behaviour during this case.
“The NSW Police was keen to bat this out all the way and they have every right to defend themselves. But this is what is truly disappointing – beyond my motives as a Micro Focus employee and more so as a taxpayer — was the lack of oversight of the case by the NSW Government.
“There was no oversight outside of the lawyers they hired. Not a single representative of the NSW Police attended these hearings.
“If you rely only on lawyers to report how well they did in court, I expect you’ll get a biased point of view. The purpose of being a lawyer is to bill, not to win.
"The cost to the taxpayer was much more than it should have been should the Police have attended. Where was the oversight to ensure the State’s money was being spent wisely?”
A spokesperson for the NSW Attorney General said that the Government considers itself "in the final stages of the case" and thus won't comment until the ink has well and truly dried.
Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.
Processing registration... Please wait.
This process can take up to a minute to complete.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED GOES EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @itnews.com.au to your white-listed senders.