Google swings job axe over 4000 at Motorola

 

Reality of slow sales bites.

The company that introduced the first commercial mobile phone in 1973, Motorola, is staring at job cuts under new parent company Google.

New York Times reported plans by the Google subsidiary to slash staff by 20 percent, or approximately 4000 jobs. A third of the jobs lost would be in the United States, the rest overseas.

There are also plans to close a third of Motorola's 94 global offices worldwide.

Google Australia would not say how many jobs will go locally or whether Motorola offices in Queensland, Victoria or New Zealand might close.

However, the New York Times reported shrinking operations at Motorola's Asia and India businesses, as research and development is moved to the US and China.

The number of vice presidents in Motorola's management has also been cut by 40 percent.

Motorola's mobile phones business has been unprofitable for 14 of the last 16 quarters as it struggles to compete with the likes of Apple and Samsung.

"Motorola understands how hard these changes will be for the employees concerned and is committed to helping them through this difficult transition," the company said in a filing to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

"Motorola will be providing generous severance packages, as well as outplacement services to help the employees find new jobs."

The job cuts would cost Google approximately $US275 million.

Google bought Motorola's mobile phone business in May this year for $US12.5 billion. The acquisition was largely thought to involve the phone maker's 17,000 patents, some of which touch upon Google's Android mobile operating system.

But the search engine giant also plans to make use of Motorola to manufacture smartphones and tablets.

Google has installed its former American sales operations chief, Dennis Woodside, as chief executive at the phone maker to revive the company.

Woodside reportedly wants to cut the number of devices made by Motorola and work on making its products more attractive through refined sensor and imaging technology, and generally focus on research and development.

However, Google faces suspicion from its present Android mobile device partners including Samsung, HTC, LG, Sony and Huawei as to whether or not it will favour Motorola ahead of them, despite promises to the latter by the search giant.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Google swings job axe over 4000 at Motorola
 
 
 
Top Stories
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
Telstra hands over copper, HFC in new $11bn NBN deal
Value of 2011 deal remains intact.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
Xero prepares for key feature coming in 2015
Dec 19, 2014
Xero users will be able to track how their business is comparing to other Xero users.
More 4G from Optus in Darwin
Nov 21, 2014
Click to see where Optus has expanded coverage to the suburbs near Darwin.
Optus steps up regional 4G coverage
Nov 20, 2014
Once 700Mhz services are working, Optus claims regional users will have a "faster and more ...
This Huawei 4G phone costs $99
Nov 12, 2014
The $99 Huawei Ascend Y550, available through Vodafone, enters the budget market as one of the ...
4G smartphones: Microsoft's Lumia 830
Nov 7, 2014
Microsoft has announced its flagship Windows Phone, the Nokia Lumia 830 4G, will be available in ...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  38%
 
Your insurance company
  4%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  3%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  19%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1869

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?