Parliament website triples navigation confusion

 

Senators insist on post-implementation review.

Senators have demanded a post-implementation review of Parliament's $3 million website upgrade after staff acknowledged it had received some 830 complaints and inquiries in the three months since launch.

The site's most regular users - politicians and their staff - website complained of an inability to find content on the new site, while some complained the live stream could not be accessed on their iPads.

“There is quite a bit of dissatisfaction [with the new website],” Senator Helen Polley told the Parliamentary Librarian, Dr Dianne Heriot,at a Senate estimates hearing this week.

“It is more cumbersome to move around the web site. It takes more mouse clicks to access information. Are you aware there are concerns from people that use the site on a daily basis?"

Herlot, whose predecessor managed the roll-out, said that while the website’s February launch was well received on Twitter and blogs, her office had received a significant increase in email inquiries seeking help in finding information buried on the website.

The inquiries centred on where to find committee reports and transcripts, how to contact members and senators, how to find ministry lists and how to upload parliamentary submissions, Heriot said.

Inquiries had “tapered off significantly” since launch - in February, Herlot's office received 353 while In April this was reduced to 169.

Herlot added the average number of information requests per month before the new site was deployed was “about 58”, indicating that users were getting used to its navigation.

She acknowledged a  post-implementation review of the costly site upgrade was likely, including an online survey of users.

The mixed reception received by the new website adds to the website's turbulent genesis.

In November last year, the Department of Parliamentary Services conceded that its site redesign was running a year late due to "substantial" changes in scope that required more development time.

The two-year revamp project was managed by ICT services firm Fujitsu and uses a content management system supplied by Sitecore.

In February, outgoing Parliamentary librarian Roxanne Missingham blamed cost over-runs of more than $614,000 on the project's complexity and heightened security concerns.

The original prime contractor for the project, Fujitsu, no longer supports the website.

Further maintenance for the website will be through a labour and materials contract with SiteCore.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Parliament website triples navigation confusion
Parliament House, Canberra
 
 
 
Top Stories
Matching databases to Linux distros
Reviewed: OS-repository DBMSs, MariaDB vs MySQL.
 
Coalition's NBN cost-benefit study finds in favour of MTM
FTTP costs too much, would take too long.
 
Who'd have picked a BlackBerry for the Internet of Things?
[Blog] BlackBerry has a more secure future in the physical world.
 
 
Parliament House, Canberra
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Which is the most prevalent cyber attack method your organisation faces?




   |   View results
Phishing and social engineering
  71%
 
Advanced persistent threats
  3%
 
Unpatched or unsupported software vulnerabilities
  11%
 
Denial of service attacks
  6%
 
Insider threats
  10%
TOTAL VOTES: 762

Vote