Google may cop $10m fine for Safari gaffe

 

US authorities prepare case.

The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) could fine Google US$10 million for circumventing privacy protections in Apple’s iPhone and iPad browser, Safari.

The regulator is preparing a case on the basis that Google deceived consumers, Bloomberg reported, citing a source familiar with the case.

The FTC will allege that Google broke a 2011 agreement with the commission over an earlier privacy gaffe.

The FTC began investigating Google's latest alleged breach in March this year, shortly after Stanford University graduate student Jonathan Mayer discovered Google “immunised” itself from Safari’s cookie blocking policy using a specially-crafted IFrame. 

The potential fine comes as European data protection authorities consider widening ongoing investigations into Google’s StreetView global wi-fi ‘war driving’ privacy breach, the New York Times reported last week. 

Privacy regulators in the Netherlands and Germany claimed Google had duped them during their investigations, following Google’s release of the Federal Communications Commission’s report of its US investigation, which revealed several Google employees knew StreetView cars were harvesting private data from unencrypted wireless access points. 

The FCC found Google had not breached US laws, but fined it US$25,000 for obstructing its investigation.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Google may cop $10m fine for Safari gaffe
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australia’s banks review the iPhone 6
ANZ, ING Direct and Westpac execs weigh in on NFC, TouchID and big screens.
 
Domain does DevOps
And they’re doing it on .NET.
 
The ethics of security
[Blog post] Where did that zero-day go?
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Which is the most prevalent cyber attack method your organisation faces?




   |   View results
Phishing and social engineering
  69%
 
Advanced persistent threats
  3%
 
Unpatched or unsupported software vulnerabilities
  10%
 
Denial of service attacks
  6%
 
Insider threats
  11%
TOTAL VOTES: 1154

Vote