Remote Queensland in $24m fibre broadband drive

 

Eyes Canberra's coffers to bolster seed funds.

Six remote Queensland towns have proposed building their own redundant 1,350 kilometre fibre link to allow residents and visitors to the area to benefit from high-speed broadband services.

Led by Barcoo Shire mayor Bruce Scott and Diamantina Shire mayor Rob Dare, the project would serve a consolidated stable population of 700 people and a transitive population of approximately 100,000 garnered through tourism and transportation as part of the towns' cattle industry.

The proposed link would interconnect with Telstra backhaul that ran between Quilpie, Longreach and Mt Isa.

Scott told iTnews he expected the link - which carried an estimated price tag of $24 million - to service six schools, health clinics, police stations, libraries and emergency services centres in the area.

The two councils have so far put up $1.4 million each - amounting to double the annual rates income of Diamantina - and last year secured equivalent funding of $2.8 million from the Queensland State Government.

They have since lobbied the Federal Government for the remainder of the funding with Scott and Dare meeting Communications Minister Senator Stephen Conroy and NBN Co chief executive Mike Quigley separately late last year.

Conroy was said to have offered in-principle support for the project but had not committed to funding.

The meetings and proposals were the culmination of four years' lobbying from the communities, having written to the likes of former communications minister Helen Coonan, former Prime Ministers John Howard and Kevin Rudd, Federal Ministers Anthony Albanese, Conroy, and successive state ministers.

According to Scott, Federal funding could be derived from $325 million left over from a telecommunications fund established by the Department of Broadband on the recommendation of the Regional Telecommunications Review.

The Government committed approximately $61 million in 2009 to regional initiatives as a result of the review but had since made no announcement on further spending.

Scott was a member of the review committee between 2007 and 2009, during the course of its investigations.

A spokesman for Conroy's office had not returned iTnews' requests for comment at time of writing.

Scott defended the massive costs involved in providing fibre to the small communities by pointing to the economic contributions of the cattle grazing and tourism industries of the towns.

"The communities we're talking about are iconic communities in Australia's history, there's a lot of people who'd like to visit these communities. We need to be in a logical state to be able to be a functional community," he said.

"It's one thing to say you divide 700 people by 20 million and the cost-benefit is not very high but if you include the contributions of these industries to the national economy it shows a completely different slant on what that cost-benefit may be."

Scott said the councils had since begun talks with Telstra and Ergon Energy in an effort to contract builders for the link.

The communities also attempted to contact private contractor Lockheed Martin with a view to connecting to a nearby 150 kilometre link owned by the Department of Defence.

Wanting more than satellite

Whatever the cost, Diamantina chief executive Scott Mason told iTnews the towns were attempting to move up from the inferior satellite access they currently had, with a goal of fibre as "the gold standard".

The towns, which get internet access via satellite under the Federal Government's $325 million Australian Broadband Guarantee, would be eligible for access to NBN Co's satellite services once they were launched in 2015.

An interim service would be available from July this year with 6 Mbps peak bandwidth speeds over Optus and IPSTAR satellites.

Although NBN Co and the Federal Government have worked to dismiss perceptions that satellite was an inferior option to fixed wireless and fibre services under the NBN, Barcoo Shire's Bruce Scott said the latency issue often involved in satellite services - regardless of speed - proved troublesome for the e-health and tele-education applications the town hoped to use in future.

The communities also feared sub-standard telecommunications under any universal service obligations provided by a proposed USO Co under the NBN.

Scott said the Telstra-owned microwave and radio links used to serve the towns now could be disconnected by 2020 with no alternate solution.

"The trouble nationally for us is that the discussion has all been about broadband, it hasn't been around telecommunications which is what the NBN ultimately will be," he said.

South-west Queensland joins several rural and remote towns taking up their own cause to build fibre in absence of NBN fibre under current eligibility criteria.

The South Australian town of Victor Harbor, chosen as a termination point for the Federal Government's $250 million Regional Broadband Blackspot Program, has sought to build its own 30 kilometre fibre loop in the town's central business district in order to make better use of the newly added backhaul.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Remote Queensland in $24m fibre broadband drive
"Ace wrote: While it's nice of you to suggest that the government should pay for FTTH for all rural areas @Rossyduck, they did give reasoning. The fact that these areas are willing to pay for ..."
By HubertCumberdale
 
 
 
Comments: 6
Rossyduck
Jun 9, 2011 4:52 PM
This is the dirty little unspoken national disgrace raised at the recent hearings into NBN Co. The NBN as envisaged by this current Government department is unfortunately all about focussing access build in areas that already have it, to then buy the Telstra customers for $10 billion, and capture the others to show a ROI. It should be about spending our tax $$ to resolve the backhaul issues we have all told the governent about inumerable times, and the services will then follow, as is the case here. To have these rural towns now having to pay for their own Ftth is bad enough, to have them also having to pay for backhaul build is disgraceful and I suspect ito of the monopoly creating legislation now also shamefully illegal.
HubertCumberdale
Jun 9, 2011 8:48 PM
Cool. This is great news, more the merrier.

This improves the value of everyone's connections.
With even more of Australia covered it'll mean you can basically move anywhere and not have to worry about internet speeds in much the same way you don’t have to worry about electricity now.
This improves the value of Australia.

Also more tourism $$$:

"Honey where should we go for our next holiday? America or Australia?"

"Well both have nice landmarks but if we want to back up our precious memories as we go then Australia is probably the better option, we can go anywhere and send the photos/videos to ourselves as we go without any hassles or wasting time and thus we have more time to enjoy the holiday, if we went to America we’d have to rely on their unreliable 18th century wireless network and it would take months to send that much data not leaving much time for the actual holiday.”

"Oh honey you are so smart, Australia it is! They have the best wildlife too and none of them are poisonous!"

"Actually..."
umbria
Jun 9, 2011 11:33 PM
Fantastic news (and isn't Rossyduck a wet blanket, folks?)! There will be many opportunities like this one.

The May 2010 NBN Implementation Study ranked clusters of premises in order of the cost of supplying them with fibre to premises. Lack of fibre backhaul was one of the obstacles, so here the Diamantina area Councils will build the backhaul and link into the amazing Emerald-Mount Isa-Darwin backhaul that is being built under the Regional Broadband Blackspots program. Once these towns have backhaul, they can join the 93% of premises where fibre is cheaper than LTE wireless to provision, so they will get it.

NBNCo's goal remains to deliver broadband to 100% of Australians, and it would deliver every connection with fibre if it could. But it has always shown itself to be fiscally responsible, and cannot deliver fibre if it costs substantially more than wireless to build. But where the locals can pay the difference (the extra amount above the 93rd percentile cost of FTTP), or as in this case bring the fibre cost down by building the missing backhaul themselves, then they will get fibre. Everybody wins.

Seriously, the coalition needs to wake up or it will again alienate large enough numbers of regional Australians to lose marginal seats in 2013 as it did in 2010, and will again risk losing what should be an unloseable election.
Rossyduck
Jun 10, 2011 10:04 AM
Sorry to be a wet blanket and suggesting ideas that would delay faster porn to those urgan dwellers than their current broadband provides - but it is a serious issue for rural commnities we should not trivialise. Our tax $$ spend should be prioritised to resolve the blackspot issue not go into areas with existing service arrangements that are working well - for example Greenfields, broadband overbuild etc. Blackspot funding has STOPPED, the service promised to rural areas is now being clarified as wirelss or sattelite, a technology our government says is inadequate. We now also have 121 separate NBN Co networks that will all require backhaul.
Ace
Jun 10, 2011 10:39 AM
While it's nice of you to suggest that the government should pay for FTTH for all rural areas @Rossyduck, they did give reasoning. The fact that these areas are willing to pay for their own FTTH just emphasises the importance of going FTTH instead of ADSL or Wireless.

One point you make that the government probably hasn't picked up on is that faster internet is for porn, and presumably slower internet is for things like education. Interesting also that you suggest the government fix blackspots on telco networks because the telcos won't. I guess this just underlines the reason for having an NBN Co run by a government that is more interested in coverage than in payback. Well spotted.
HubertCumberdale
Jun 10, 2011 12:27 PM
Ace wrote:
While it's nice of you to suggest that the government should pay for FTTH for all rural areas @Rossyduck, they did give reasoning. The fact that these areas are willing to pay for their own FTTH just emphasises the importance of going FTTH instead of ADSL or Wireless.

rustyducts 'concern' with rural areas is a farce: http://www.itnews.com.au/forums/yaf_postst54606_Bartlett-Get-hands-dirty-on-NBN-strategy.aspx
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 510

Vote