WHO says mobile phone use 'possibly carcinogenic'

 

Now in the same cancer risk category as lead, chloroform and coffee.

Using a mobile phone may increase the risk of developing certain types of brain tumour and consumers should consider ways of reducing their exposure, World Health Organisation (WHO) cancer experts said on Tuesday.

A working group of 31 scientists from 14 countries meeting at the WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) said a review of all the available scientific evidence suggested cell phone use should be classified as "possibly carcinogenic".

The classification, which puts mobile phone use in the same broad IARC cancer risk category as lead, chloroform and coffee, could spur the United Nations health body to look again at its guidelines on mobile phones, the scientists said.

But more lengthy and detailed research is needed before a more definitive answer on any link can be given.

The WHO had previously said there was no established evidence for a link between cell phone use and cancer.

"After reviewing essentially all the evidence that is relevant... the working group classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans," Jonathan Samet, chair of the IARC group, said in a telebriefing.

He said some evidence suggested a link between an increased risk for glioma, a type of brain cancer, and mobile phone use.

The WHO's position has been keenly awaited by mobile phone companies and by campaign groups who have raised concerns about whether cell phones might be harmful to health.

Industry groups immediately sought to play down the decision, stressing that the "possibly carcinogenic" category also includes substances such as pickled vegetables and coffee.

"This IARC classification does not mean that cell phones cause cancer," said John Walls, vice president of public affairs for the United States-based wireless association CTIA.

He noted that the IARC working group did not conduct any new research, but reviewed published studies, and said other regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration have stated that "the weight of scientific evidence has not linked cell phones with any health problems".

John Cooke, executive director of the British-based Mobile Operators Association, said IARC had only found the possibility of a hazard. "Whether or not this represents a risk requires further scientific investigation," he said in a statement.

 

The IARC remarks follow a study published last year which looked at almost 13,000 cell phone users over 10 years and found no clear answer on whether the mobile devices cause brain tumours.

Many previous studies have also failed to establish any clear cancer link, but a U.S. study in February found that using a mobile phone can change brain cell activity.

Use of mobile phones has increased hugely since their introduction in the early- to mid-1980s. About 5 billion mobile phones are currently in use worldwide.

Christopher Wild, IARC's director, said it was important that more research should be conducted, particularly into long-term and heavy use of mobile phones.

"Pending the availability of such information, it is important to take pragmatic measures to reduce exposure such as hands-free devices or texting," he said.

Malcolm Sperrin, director of medical physics and clinical engineering at Britain's Royal Berkshire Hospital, said he thought the IARC move was appropriate because it reflected the "anecdotal evidence that cancers may be associated with phone usage".

But he added: "It is vitally important to fully understand that there is no definitive correlation".

(Additional reporting by Sinead Carew in New York, editing by Mark Heinrich)

Copyright Reuters Copyright Reuters. Click for restrictions.



WHO says mobile phone use 'possibly carcinogenic'
"I guess the big shock in this article was the coffee. We tested cell phones back in the early GSM days - even when we managed to get a skull cavity to resonate the heating issue was a red herring ..."
By Rossyduck
 
 
 
Comments: 6
Ace
Jun 1, 2011 9:40 AM
Of course this is of grave concern to most IT workers. Coffee possibly carcinogenic? It simply can't be true!
anonymous
Jun 1, 2011 2:38 PM

OMG, next thing they will be claiming that pizza is a problem!

Oh, it seems that they already are. . .
Ezy2Confuze
Jun 2, 2011 2:39 PM
Seriously, all 31 scientists in 14 counries can come with is "possibly carcinogenic". Next time these 14 countries are looking to cut some fat out of their budgets, there's 31 scientists on the payroll to choose from. At least this way, when a staff member tells me they don't want a BB because the amount it puts out is higher than the Australian standard, I can wave this report around and tell them, hey, there's no REAL proof out there to support your claim it's doing you damage.
Ace
Jun 2, 2011 5:12 PM
Suggest an Android device to them @Ezy. I pretty sure Android scrambles your brain-waves far less than either Blackberry or iPhone.

Edited by Ace: 2/6/2011 05:13:56 PM
umbria
Jun 6, 2011 4:49 PM
... so, does an iPhone turn your brain into Apple sauce?

Jokes aside, it stands to reason that an omnidirectional transmitter capable of powerful bursts of microwave-band energy (the frequency range that cooks food) is going to bombard your brain, especially when trying to maintain contact with a tower showing only one or two bars of signal.

Children's brains have a higher water contact, and absorb more microwave energy, which is why Israel and the UK ban mobile phones for under-16s.

The good news is that separating phone from body by a few inches dramatically lowers the EMR dose you receive. so it's a no-brainer (sorry about that) to talk on speaker or a headset, especially for longer calls. In fact, your phone's instruction book (ever read it?) has told you this for years. Safe phoning, folks.
Rossyduck
Jun 7, 2011 9:07 AM
I guess the big shock in this article was the coffee. We tested cell phones back in the early GSM days - even when we managed to get a skull cavity to resonate the heating issue was a red herring and is the one the industry loves to trot out to discredit the notion with impressive self explanatory aparatus and everyone can sagely nod their heads, go home, make a call and sit down to a meal giddy with the thrill of having played with science.

The issue of concern was the impact on cells when they divided. Apparently these cells do not divide at the precise time when there is radiation building up (saved the species in times of high solar activity etc) but the GSM signal has a very sharp turn on - same thing that makes immunity to GSM so difficult - with one of my collegues swearing he saw petri dish abnomalities - would be worth looking at further. Wish we had had more budget at the time.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
Top Stories
Photos: Google I/O 2013
Evolution not revolution.
 
Photos: NextDC builds S1 data centre
Prepares for September launch.
 
QLD Govt contributed to payroll project 'death spiral'
Inquiry hears from independent expert.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
eftpos to trial "mobile wallet"
May 17, 2013
eftpos, the operator of Australia's most widely used debit card system will soon start a mobile ...
New iiNet 4G phone plans include free calls between phones on same account
May 16, 2013
iiNet's new 4G mobile business plans provide free calls between handsets on the same account as ...
Revealed: $1,000+ for Microsoft's Surface Pro in Australia, with keyboard
May 16, 2013
You'll pay more than $1,000 for Microsoft Surface Pro with a keyboard, Microsoft has officially ...
Is this the future of business laptops?
May 15, 2013
The Lenovo ThinkPad Helix is a fully-fledged business laptop running Windows 8 Pro, but detach ...
Federal Budget 2013: So what are you going to be required to pay?
May 15, 2013
Opinion: Want a handy summary of the 2013 federal budget? Here is one by Newcastle accountants ...
Latest Comments
Polls
Do you prefer the Coalition's NBN policy?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 1613

Vote