Ellison seeks bay view in tree stoush

 

Good fences does not include giant trees.

Oracle boss Larry Ellison plans to commence legal proceedings against his San Francisco neighbours over trees planted on their property which block his view. 

Ellison is unhappy that his neighbour’s three redwood pines and an acacia have blocked the clear view of San Francisco’s bay that the property had when he purchased it in 1998, according to a Wall Street Journal report.  

The dispute with his neighbours, the Von Bothmers, has been running for several years, with multiple attempts at conciliation failing to find a compromise.

Ellison had even offered US$15 million to the Von Bothmers to buy the property, which was rejected despite the US$8 million premium on its 2004 purchase price.  

A trial to settle the dispute will begin June 6, 2011.

The trees have reportedly blocked the view from the third-floor of Ellison's five bedroom property -- a space he uses for entertaining. He plans to spend more time at the house during the 2013 America’s Cup yacht race in 2013, according to the report. 

Ellison has also denied a claim by the Von Bothmers that he ordered one of his workers to clip the offending trees, and claimed in a deposition that he had willingly removed several redwoods on his property after a neighbour complained they would eventually block her view.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Ellison seeks bay view in tree stoush
 
 
 
Top Stories
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
Telstra hands over copper, HFC in new $11bn NBN deal
Value of 2011 deal remains intact.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  38%
 
Your insurance company
  4%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  3%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  19%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1878

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?