IBM says email filing a waste of time

 

Study finds folder users slower and no more successful.

IBM researchers have found that email users who spend time putting their messages in folders are no more successful at "re-finding" them than users who simply let their inboxes grow.

Results of the study, 'Am I wasting my time organizing email?', were first reported by MIT's Technology Review.

The study [pdf] aimed to compare "the success of preparatory vs. opportunistic retrieval" of emails.

Preparatory organisation characterised users who "deliberately create manual folder structures or tags that anticipate the context of retrieval.

"Such preparation contrasts with opportunistic management that shifts the burden to the time of retrieval," the study noted.

Researchers gave 345 email users access to an email client that supported a variety of email management techniques, including folders, search, tagging and threading of messages.

The users made 85,000 attempts to find old messages over the course of the study.

The study found that users who sorted their emails into folders took "marginally longer" to discover them than those who simply tried searching their huge inbox.

"More important is how often people successfully find the target message," the researchers noted.

"We expected high filers to be more successful given their investment in preparing materials for retrieval.

"Contrary to our expectations, high filers were no more successful at finding messages than low filers."

The researchers said study data supported opportunistic access. "People who create complex folders indeed rely on these for retrieval, but these preparatory behaviours do not improve retrieval success."

The study recommended that email client developers offer "different features or mailbox views" that were optimised for the different ways that users worked with email.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


IBM says email filing a waste of time
"Fairly late to comment on this story, but... The question that many of your comments raises for me, is - where are you people working? Working within government and large corporates for the past ..."
By dubious
 
 
 
Comments: 10
realitybites
May 25, 2011 2:25 PM
"Researchers gave 345 email users"

Wow, with a conclusive test base of that size, they have me convinced!
rycrozier
May 25, 2011 2:44 PM
@realitybites, what sample size is enough?

On a personal note, I do wonder whether the time I spend filing all my emails away really helps. I can find them again sometimes, but it does drive me bonkers when I can't remember my own filing system.
realitybites
May 25, 2011 3:29 PM
I was being sarcastic because I can't quite understand the point of the research. The simple answer to your question is 1, whatever works for the person using the client.

With modern mail clients these days using search is much faster. Mail clients of a few years ago had very ordinary, if not down right buggy search facilities.

So it was probably faster back then to do the folder thing and try and get some order. I used to do that myself. Now I archive yearly into one folder and use the search function. Evolution and Thunderbird are the best clients, bearing in mind I don't use Windows. As tech improves people usually change their habits, so what worked well a few years ago, might not be the case today or indeed into the future.
BrettWinterford
May 25, 2011 4:25 PM
How much did Google pay IBM for this!!!
:)
Shaun_73
May 25, 2011 4:28 PM
I can see how studies might come up with these results, but the game changes enormously for organisations who are bound to recordkeeping legislation such as the various state and federal records acts. This can affect Federal, State and Local Government bodies, financial institutions, medical industry etc.

Under these acts and regulations e-mail users are obliged to file information of corporate value in an official recordkeeping system such as an Electronic Document Management System. Letting stuff build up in the Inbox is a major breach of their recordkeeping obligations.

The good news is that a decent EDMS has powerful search tools that deliver what you want extremely quickly.
Ezy2Confuze
May 25, 2011 5:46 PM
Well after just finishing our 6th friggin audit in 15 months, I'm glad I organise my emails and archive them properly. I guess the 345 email users were all Managers, not the worker bees who generally know how things actually work in an organisation.

By the way, were they using Notes or Outlook for the searching? I can't comment on Notes, however Outlook's search can be very hit and miss.
realitybites
May 25, 2011 6:14 PM
@Ezy - I have used Outlook in the past and I found exactly the same thing.

Since shifting almost everything to a nix system approx 2 year's ago, I have to say that Evolution is THE best mail client I have ever used, period. It's search functionality is outstanding and it's the only client I know that can write to LDAP without any extra plugins.

I just can't envision myself using anything else these days. It's a pity there is no (working) Windows port available.
LookOut
May 26, 2011 9:23 AM
I gave up sorting years ago after I discovered Nelson Email Organiser. Using Exchange with Outlook I archive all email off every six months into PST files (small business user). I can search emails on separate components of the email by name, groups of emails (company etc), by date, attachment, category, status etc back to 1997. Biggest email time save ever!
Ace
May 26, 2011 12:46 PM
Thunderbird is extremely quick at finding emails, but the reason I use still use folders is to break the emails into more manageable file sizes on the local disk. Of course, if you're stuck with Exchange, you may not have this flexibility.
dubious
May 27, 2011 11:02 AM
Fairly late to comment on this story, but... The question that many of your comments raises for me, is - where are you people working? Working within government and large corporates for the past 20 years, (probably around 25 different organisations) you don't get to choose the email app you're using during your working day, (which is the only place I receive a large enough quantity of the stuff to have to try and organise). Exchange is de-rigueur in Corporate Aus (Notes still exists, but is diminishing), and the opportunity to download and install other little ad-ins onto an SOE box (connected to the business LAN, WAN whatever) is almost always out of the question.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 510

Vote