Giants knee-capped in Novell patent raid

 

Must stick to GNU V2 and ONI.

Microsoft, EMC, Apple and Oracle have made major concessions in order to proceed with buying hundreds of Novell’s open source patents as part of its merger with Attachmate. 

The original deal would have limited the ability of open source software to innovate and compete in server, desktop and mobile operating systems, middleware, and virtualisation , the Department of Justice’s anti-monopoly division said on Wednesday.

Under the amended deal, Microsoft agreed to sell back to Attachmate the Novell patents it would buy. In return, it will receive a licence to use those patents and those that Oracle, Apple and EMC bought or that Novell retained. 

EMC also agreed not to buy 33 virtualisation patents held by Novell. 

The concessions allowed CPTN Holdings, owned by the four giants, to proceed under the condition that Novell’s patents remained subject to the GNU General Public License, Version 2 and the Open Invention Network License. 

That latter licence announced ahead of the department's statement, had seen a 28 percent surge in members over the past three months, including Hewlett-Packard, Facebook, Juniper and Fujitsu General.  

The department's anti-monopoly division vowed to watch how the companies handled the patents.

CPTN does not have the right to limit which patents were available under the open invention licence, and cannot force or influence Novell or Attachmate to modify which are available.

“Although we recognise that the various changes to the agreement recently made by the parties are helpful, the department will continue to investigate the distribution of patents to ensure continued competition,” said Sharis Pozen, Deputy Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department’s anti-monopoly division.  

The original plan involved CPTN acquiring 882 patents and patent applications, then divvying up the loot between each vendor in the group. 

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Giants knee-capped in Novell patent raid
"> Must stick to GNU V2 and ONI. I guess you mean GPL and OIN Licence. > ... under the condition that Novell’s patents remained subject to the GNU General Public License, Version 2 and the Open ..."
By kartsie
 
 
 
Comments: 2
Ace
Apr 23, 2011 10:50 PM
All these software patents need to be like so many software licenses. Non-transferable.
kartsie
Apr 28, 2011 9:48 AM
> Must stick to GNU V2 and ONI.

I guess you mean GPL and OIN Licence.

> ... under the condition that Novell’s patents remained subject to the GNU General Public License, Version 2 and the Open Invention Network License

How are *patents* subject to a *copyright* licence? They're completely separate parts of the so-called intellectual property laws, and the actual text of patents are--I believe--public domain.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 510

Vote