Conroy scales back NBN cherry-picker clauses

 

Exemptions to placate an angry industry.

The Federal Government has proposed changes to the NBN Access Bill that could appease network builders by exempting many of them from tough anti-cherry-picking rules.

After months of industry backlash, Communications Minister Stephen Conroy sought to limit the scope of the rules – which had been designed primarily to shield NBN Co from being undermined in metropolitan areas.

But Conroy stopped short of deleting the rules altogether, as had been proposed by the Coalition and several ISPs.

The proposed anti-cherry-picking rules would force carriers that built new or upgraded existing fibre networks to provide an open access, wholesale service to internet retailers.

They were viewed by the Government as necessary to stop the private sector cherry-picking low-cost, high-density areas to build or upgrade high-speed fixed networks before the NBN could arrive.

New exemptions

Under the proposed revisions, providers of backhaul networks and those who serviced only corporate and government clients would no longer be captured by the laws.

The laws would only apply to network operators servicing residential, sole trader and small business customers that employed up to 15 people, according to a revised explanatory memorandum.

Other exemptions were proposed in Section 141B, which had the effect of stopping greenfields network builders and minor local fibre upgrades from being unnecessarily caught in the cherry-picking net.

"The deemed network extension rule will not apply to extensions of a telecommunications networks where a part of the infrastructure of that network is physically located in a particular area that is being or was developed as a particular stage of a real estate development project and the network is extended to another area that is being, or is to be, developed as another stage of the project," the memorandum noted.

"This exemption provides certainty for carriers that have already rolled out networks in parts of real estate developments that they can continue to roll out in other parts of the same development without being subject to proposed subsection (2).

"Furthermore, proposed subsection 141B(4) provides that the deemed extension rule... does not apply to extensions of a telecommunications network that was in existence before 1 January 2011 and which is extended on or after 1 January 2011, and no point on the infrastructure of the extension is located more than one kilometre (or a longer distance is specified in the regulations) from a point on the infrastructure of the network as the network stood immediately before 1 January 2011.

"This exemption will clarify that carriers may build minor extensions adjacent to their existing networks without being subject to subsection (2)."

Other changes

Besides addressing the cherry-picking furore, several other amendments to the Access Bill were proposed.

They included a section that gave NBN Co the power to refuse to interconnect at points of presence not specified by regulators.

Another section would limit the amount of cross-subsidisation that NBN Co could impose on metropolitan areas to pay for the network build in less economic regional and rural sites.

The Government also sought to make changes to the NBN Companies Bill that would exempt any deal between NBN Co and Telstra from state stamp duties or other taxes.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Conroy scales back NBN cherry-picker clauses
"Interesting point, Ross, but your own interest in this may have coloured your comments. On the one hand we have you saying that NBN standards are stodgy (?), while some other critics are loudly ..."
By anonymous
 
 
 
Comments: 3
Rossyduck
Mar 24, 2011 9:00 AM
Talk about gross abuse of government power. Pity the poor Greenfields operators and their good faith investment in plant and people. They developed the industry, invented some of the technology and will now be penalised in new developments and forced to build to stodgy NBN Co "standards' - not ACMA or industry approved. Greenfield was never originally mentioned when the NBN was announced. Looks a like a desperate bid to prop up NBN Co reveneues, and ignore the consequences of wiping out a succeful industry that is not taxpayer funded. Isn't the ACCC meant to stop such bully boy antics ?.
Mordd
Mar 24, 2011 2:06 PM
Go back to your anti-NBN fantasy land Rossyduck, these amendments address the majority of industry concern and will provide certainty for all parties going forward. Did you even read the article or do you only post your little conspiracy theories and then f off?
anonymous
Mar 24, 2011 2:08 PM

Interesting point, Ross, but your own interest in this may have coloured your comments.

On the one hand we have you saying that NBN standards are stodgy (?), while some other critics are loudly claiming that NBN is far too advanced for what they assert will be needed in future in Australia.

And the point about whether an industry is taxpayer funded may be relevant as a national accounts entry, but for years we have seen examples of large non-taxpayer-funded companies attempting to use their bulk and cashflow in some particularly anticompetitive ways.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 510

Vote