iiTrial costs case likely in June

 

Evidence to be filed by mid-April.

ISP iiNet may have to wait until June to argue costs stemming from its latest success in a long-running copyright case with the film industry, due to the unavailability of one of three Federal Court judges.

The ISP won the latest round of court proceedings last month after the Federal Court dismissed an appeal by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT).

iiNet chief Michael Malone said last month that the case in its entirety - including the original trial and appeal - had cost the ISP alone some $6.5 million to date. Last year, the ISP reported that the legal costs stemming from the original trial had come to about $3.8 million.

The film industry has not put a price on its legal costs, saying only that they represented a "substantial investment".

One of three judges on the Full Bench of the Federal Court, Justice Arthur Emmett, said today he would not be able to set a date for hearings on costs from the appeal "without consulting other members of the court".

Justice Emmett said that Justice Jayne Jagot was "on leave from the end of April until [start of] June".

Both AFACT and iiNet were asked to submit potential dates for the costs hearings, expected to take up to a day of the court's time.

Evidence on costs was to be filed by April 15. The matter was listed for further directions on April 29.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


iiTrial costs case likely in June
"The content corporations may choose to see it as 'a substantial investment' in their apparently continuing attempts to keep us all back in the 50s, but no doubt most people will see their lavish ..."
By anonymous
 
 
 
Comments: 1
anonymous
Mar 12, 2011 1:41 PM

The content corporations may choose to see it as 'a substantial investment' in their apparently continuing attempts to keep us all back in the 50s, but no doubt most people will see their lavish expenditure for exactly what it is.

It seems that iiNet has been forced to ingest a Coogee Bay sandwich in this matter, and if the law was not such an ass, iiNet should be able to claim every dollar of the costs that they have been forced to incur.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 510

Vote