Salmat slides on Telstra call centre loss

 

May deadline to find new jobs for staff.

Salmat shares slid six percent following Telstra's decision not to renew contracts for 742 staff at outsourced call centres across the eastern states.

Shares recovered slightly to be down 5.5 percent to $3.90 in late trade.

In a statement to the stock exchange, Salmat said it was "notified by Telstra that Telstra no longer requires the provision of certain call centre services from Salmat".

"The notification covers the bulk of of the call centre services Salmat currently provides to Telstra," the statement read.

Trying to put a brave face on the loss of business that will cost it $4 million to $5 million a year or about 5 percent of its annual revenue, Salmat said it was in line with the provider's "strategy ... to move away from labour hire call centre contracts".

Salmat has until May to find jobs for the 742 outsourced call centre staff affected in:

  • Surry Hills, NSW, 330 jobs
  • Geelong, Victoria, 163
  • Wagga Wagga, NSW,142
  • Bundaberg, Queensland, 107

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Salmat slides on Telstra call centre loss
 
Readers of this article also read...
 
 
Top Stories
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
Telstra hands over copper, HFC in new $11bn NBN deal
Value of 2011 deal remains intact.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  39%
 
Your insurance company
  3%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  7%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  2%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  20%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1781

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?