Canberra calls snap TIO review

 

Transparency on the table.

The Federal Government has called a snap review of the telecommunications industry ombudsman (TIO) that could change its structure and transparency.

The Department of Communications has released a discussion paper detailing a number of proposed reforms for the scheme.

The announcement came just months after iTnews columnist David Havyatt noted the urgency for an industry-led review to address criticisms from ISPs and customers – or face intervention from Canberra.

"If the latter outcome occurs, the industry should not be surprised if a new scheme does not serve their best interests," Havyatt warned.

Indeed, the Government sought comment on a range of proposals aimed at opening the TIO's structure up to public scrutiny and cutting out bad practices.

They included:

  • Making the TIO subject to an independent public review every three to five years
  • Creating a "single overseeing governance body" to replace the current three-tier approach of a council, board of directors and the ombudsman's office
  • Giving the Minister or ACMA some oversight or veto powers over the TIO's constitution

The Government was particularly concerned with the overall transparency of the TIO scheme.

It questioned if the scheme could balance the interests of industry and consumer groups.

The Government was also concerned about the "capacity for industry to control the high-level policy direction" of the TIO, due to the scheme's governance structure.

"The confidential nature of board and council meetings impedes the visibility of governance processes," the discussion paper stated.

"Insight into how conflicts between the board and council are resolved in the best interests of consumers is hindered by this lack of transparency."

The paper raised the prospect that the TIO's jurisdiction was too narrow and should be widened to keep pace with changes in services and products available in the industry.

"The continued popularity of bundled services/packages for telecommunications consumers and continuing customer confusion about where to pursue complaints on this topic remains an unresolved issue," the paper noted.

"It is understood that the TIO is proposing to amend its constitution to widen its jurisdiction over some bundled products and services."

The review would also examine whether to raise industry fees for dealing with low-level complaints to persuade ISPs and telcos to invest more in their own complaints-handling functions. This was in response to a large number of Level 1 complaints that were resolved when they were referred by the TIO back to the service provider.

Telcos have long questioned the methodologies used by the TIO distorted the number of complaints it received, suggesting a review of the scheme was overdue.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Canberra calls snap TIO review
 
 
 
Top Stories
Can the ATO use IT to shed its old-school reputation?
Inside the ‘reinvention’ at the hands of new management.
 
JB Hi-Fi's new CIO gets 'clean slate' for change
New AusPost, Tabcorp exec to get his hands dirty.
 
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
The 5 Windows 10 privacy issues you should be aware of
Jul 31, 2015
There are a few unsettling details when it comes to Windows 10 privacy
Windows 10 is here! (For some)
Jul 29, 2015
Delivery of the free upgrade versions of Windows 10 began today - have you got yours yet?
Microsoft reveals Microsoft Send, a new enterprise chat app to rival Slack
Jul 27, 2015
Microsoft Send is MSN Messenger for grownups, and you could be using it at work very soon
Developers offered $500,000 grants to find HoloLens uses
Jul 8, 2015
Can augmented-reality end up in business?
Microsoft Tossup: The planning app for unorganised groups of friends
Jul 8, 2015
App allows friends to research venues, vote on plans and chat. And depending on how you run your ...
Latest Comments
Polls
Should law enforcement be able to buy and use exploits?



   |   View results
Yes
  14%
 
No
  51%
 
Only in special circumstances
  18%
 
Yes, but with more transparency
  18%
TOTAL VOTES: 835

Vote