Rights group eyes ISP anti-piracy roundtable

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Seeks resumption of talks on industry code.

Rights holders have wasted no time seeking an audience with internet service providers in the wake of the iiTrial appeal judgment, calling for a "roundtable" to deal with online piracy just a day after AFACT's appeal in a case against iiNet was rejected in the Federal Court.

In a letter dated 25 February, Music Industry Piracy Investigations (MIPI) general manager Sabiene Heindl sought "an industry led solution in the form of a code agreed between content rights holders (and their representatives) and ISPs".

"The Australian Content Industry Group has asked the Government to facilitate an industry roundtable that would bring together representatives of the key content industries and internet service providers to start the process of drawing up an industry code of conduct to address the ongoing issue of copyright theft online," Heindl wrote [pdf].

"This code would not only deal with illegal fire-sharing, but contemplate other forms of infringement on the internet (either presently or in the future)".

It would not be the first time a code had been called for or considered by the Government.

Communications Minister Stephen Conroy had called for talks on an industry code to resume after the original judgment in the iiNet case in February last year; a call that was rejected by the internet industry.

Last week's Full Bench decision in the Federal Court was less comprehensively in the ISP industry's favour than the outcome of the original case.

Neither side in the case – iiNet or the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft – has yet revealed whether they will seek leave to appeal to the High Court.

ACIG "flexible"

Heindl revealed the ISP roundtable plan in a submission to a House of Representatives Committee inquiry into the "role and potential" of the National Broadband Network.

She said that rights holders, under the guise of the Australian Content Industry Group (ACIG), remained "flexible on all possible options that could achieve the primary objective of securing a substantial reduction in copyright theft on the internet, thus enabling legitimate content on the NBN to thrive."

ACIG members included MIPI, Microsoft, the Business Software Alliance, Copyright Agency Limited and the Australian Recording Industry Association.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Rights group eyes ISP anti-piracy roundtable
 
 
 
Top Stories
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
Telstra hands over copper, HFC in new $11bn NBN deal
Value of 2011 deal remains intact.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
Xero prepares for key feature coming in 2015
Dec 19, 2014
Xero users will be able to track how their business is comparing to other Xero users.
More 4G from Optus in Darwin
Nov 21, 2014
Click to see where Optus has expanded coverage to the suburbs near Darwin.
Optus steps up regional 4G coverage
Nov 20, 2014
Once 700Mhz services are working, Optus claims regional users will have a "faster and more ...
This Huawei 4G phone costs $99
Nov 12, 2014
The $99 Huawei Ascend Y550, available through Vodafone, enters the budget market as one of the ...
4G smartphones: Microsoft's Lumia 830
Nov 7, 2014
Microsoft has announced its flagship Windows Phone, the Nokia Lumia 830 4G, will be available in ...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  39%
 
Your insurance company
  3%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  7%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  2%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  20%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1803

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?