Internet industry rejects Conroy's call for code

 

iiNet judgement changes the game.

Internet Industry Association (IIA) chief Peter Coroneos has rejected calls from Communications Minister Stephen Conroy to resume ISP 'code of practice' talks in the wake of iiNet's victory in the Federal Court last week.

Describing Justice Cowdroy's decision to exonerate iiNet a "very comprehensive statement as to where liability begins and ends," Coroneos told a meeting of ISP and legal experts on Tuesday night that he did not see a code of conduct as the most appropriate next step for the industry.

"The IIA does not condone copyright infringement and will continue to push for new commercial models in which content is accessible and affordable," he said.

"Senator Conroy called us for a reinstatement of discussions around an industry code of practice. But we think it is premature to consider if it is an appropriate next step for us."

click to view full size image
Coroneos speaking to media after the iiNet vs AFACT judgement

Coroneos said that Justice Cowdroy's momentous decision was required to give intermediaries such as telcos and ISPs some legal clarity around their responsibilities.

"For the record, our discussions around an industry code of practice were not terminated because of the trial," he said.

"Rather, the trial was required for discussions to continue. Discussions were on foot when we reached the view that our disagreement was so great, we needed the benefit of a judicial finding to move forward. We also did not want to prejudice iiNet's interests or the findings of the court."

Simon Hackett, CEO of Adelaide-based ISP Internode echoed Coroneos' comments in a column in Business Spectator today, saying that the piracy problem "doesn't need another darn industry code of conduct, Senator Conroy.

"Industry codes are a tool to be used by cooperative people to solve a problem cooperatively.

"That isn't happening here," he said, referring to the film industry's refusal to work with ISPs to offer content on an affordable and accessible basis. "At least, not yet.

"What AFACT needs to do is to put away the stick and starting using a carrot."

ACTA: the next challenge

The IIA will now meet the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) on Friday to discuss the next challenge for the internet industry - Australia's participation in the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), which have to date been held in secret.

Representatives from DFAT assured iTnews last week that a "three strikes rule", in which an ISP would be forced to cut off a customer found to have shared pirated material on more than two occasions, was not on the agenda at these talks. But industry watchers remain suspicious.

Coroneos described ACTA as "another avenue whereby traditional content industries are looking to the Government" to intervene to force ISP's to take responsibility for their networks.

"We are calling for greater transparency in that discussion," Coroneos said. "These global rules require input from intermediaries and end users."


Internet industry rejects Conroy's call for code
""no positive obligation on any person to protect the copyright of another" Sen Conroy, can you read these words? again for those that maybe a little slow on the uptake, "no positive obligation ..."
By gikku
 
 
 
Comments: 2
Mark D
Feb 11, 2010 3:08 PM
"The IIA does not condone copyright infringement and will continue to push for new commercial models in which content is accessible and affordable,"

I absolutely agree. The shift of gaming piracy that Steam brought to the industry was a fantastic step forward. I myself spent more on Steam over the Christmas period special than ever before. Surely a DRM codec of a kind could be developed/used for the industry?(besides the iTunes mess). Steam even goes so far as to support backing up the games themselves. Why is this unachievable for the rest of the Entertainment Industry?
gikku
Feb 11, 2010 10:22 PM
"no positive obligation on any person to protect the copyright of another"
Sen Conroy, can you read these words?

again for those that maybe a little slow on the uptake,

"no positive obligation on any person to protect the copyright of another"
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Vito Forte: A CIO for tough times
Fortescue Metals CIO talks vendor management and innovation.
 
Tech staff spared in ANZ's 1000 job cuts
Cost cutting hits middle management.
 
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  83%
 
No
  17%
TOTAL VOTES: 245

Vote