iiNet calls 'cherry-picking' at South Brisbane exchange

 

Seeks clarity on open access.

ISP iiNet has made a bid to have Telstra's fibre upgrade of the South Brisbane exchange captured by anti-cherry-picking rules being debated in Canberra.

The rules would force Telstra to provide a Layer 2 bitstream service on an open access basis to competitors – arrangements the incumbent was yet to clarify as part of the upgrade project.

South Brisbane Exchange was being relocated and upgraded from copper to fibre to make way for a new hospital. About 40 percent of existing copper connections in the exchange area were served by Telstra's competitors, according to a report by The Australian.

Competitors – including iiNet – had previously raised concerns about what might happen to their customers on the exchange once the upgrade was completed.

The ISP now wants the planned NBN legislation to provide it – and other ISPs – assurance that Telstra would have to play by similar open access rules in South Brisbane to those that compelled the incumbent to open the copper network.

For South Brisbane to be caught by the cherry-picking net, several amendments to the Access Bill would be required.

iiNet recommended the cherry-picker rules "only apply to vertically-integrated network owners" and that the wording of the rules be tightened so that small upgrades – such as those affecting an exchange area - weren't allowed to slip through the cracks.

This could be achieved by changing references to "networks" in the legislation to "network units", which were specific subsets of "networks" that were defined in the Telco Act.

The legal team at iiNet argued a wording change was required because the term "networks" was open to legal interpretations that could favour cherry-pickers over NBN Co.

"Although Telstra's FTTP upgrade would come into existence after 25 November 2010, Telstra's broader national "telecommunications network"—which the FTTP upgrade in the South Brisbane ESA [exchange service area] would be part of—has been in existence for many years prior to 25 November 2010," iiNet's chief regulatory officer Steve Dalby noted in a senate submission [pdf].

"Arguably, the broad meaning of "network" allows this provision to be interpreted so that it can only apply to new entrants in the market building their first telecommunications network".

"[In addition] if Telstra's FTTP upgrade is otherwise considered to be an alteration or upgrade of its existing national "telecommunications network", then arguably, Telstra's telecommunications network would not have become "capable of being used to supply a superfast carriage service to customers" as a result of the FTTP upgrade.

"This is because Telstra is likely to already have existing network units outside of the South Brisbane ESA that are capable of being used to supply a superfast carriage service to customers, and these form part of its national telecommunications network.

"Therefore, the broad meaning of "network" allows this provision to be interpreted so that it can only apply to owners of existing telecommunications networks that do not currently have any network units capable of supplying a superfast carriage service to customers.

"Therefore, in order to give proper effect to the intention of the proposed provisions and to ensure vertically-integrated carriers are prevented from favouring their retail businesses over other access seekers, it is submitted that "networks" be substituted for "network units" as recommended".

There was no question that Telstra was capable of opening the South Brisbane exchange as a wholesale product. Industry consensus was that Telstra's FTTP trial in Point Cook, near Melbourne, was a test site whose systems would also apply in South Brisbane, but this has never been officially confirmed by Telstra.

The submission by iiNet recommended that owners or controllers of network units "supplying a fixed-line carriage service to only wholesale customers" should be exempted from cherry-picking rules, unless they specifically made a play to "undermine Government policy".

In that case, the Communications Minister should have the power to selectively intervene and apply the cherry-picker rules where he or she saw fit, iiNet said.

The ISP also recommended that, if passed, the proposed laws be enacted as soon as possible, stripping an "adjustment" period for the industry that the ISP warned could be used by some as a grace period to circumvent the rules.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


iiNet calls 'cherry-picking' at South Brisbane exchange
 
 
 
Top Stories
The True Cost of BYOD - 2014 survey
Twelve months on from our first study, is BYOD a better proposition?
 
Photos: Unboxing the Magnus supercomputer
Pawsey's biggest beast slots into place.
 
ANZ looks to life beyond the transaction
If digital disruptors think an online payments startup could rock the big four, they’ve missed the point of why people use banks, says Patrick Maes.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
Pass on carbon tax savings, warns ACCC
Jul 24, 2014
The ACCC is warning businesses that supply "regulated goods" to pass on any cost savings ...
Have customers that won't pay debts?
Jul 10, 2014
The ACCC and ASIC have updated their advice when it comes to collecting debts.
Carpet cleaner faces court over online testimonials
Jul 4, 2014
The ACCC has initiated proceedings against A Whistle (1979) Pty Ltd, the franchisor of Electrodry...
You can now get 15GB of free online storage using Microsoft OneDrive
Jun 25, 2014
Cloud storage has reached both the capacity and price where it's a viable alternative to local ...
Another clever trick you can perform with Xero
Jun 25, 2014
Here is another way to reach out to particular subsets of your customers using Xero.
Latest Comments
Polls
What is delaying adoption of public cloud in your organisation?







   |   View results
Lock-in concerns
  29%
 
Application integration concerns
  3%
 
Security and compliance concerns
  28%
 
Unreliable network infrastructure
  9%
 
Data sovereignty concerns
  22%
 
Lack of stakeholder support
  3%
 
Protecting on-premise IT jobs
  4%
 
Difficulty transitioning CapEx budget into OpEx
  3%
TOTAL VOTES: 1105

Vote