Microsoft contests Apple App Store patent

 

Microsoft believes the term 'app store' is too generic for Apple to have a trademark on it.

Microsoft has launched a legal challenge against Apple’s trademark claim over the term ‘App Store.’

The Redmond giant said in a filing with the US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board that the words ‘app’ and ‘store’ were simply too generic for Apple to have a trademark on the phrase.

“When viewed as a whole, the combination of the generic term ’app’ with the generic term ‘store’ is nothing more than the sum of its parts and is not capable of identifying and distinguishing a single source,” the filing read.

Microsoft even went as far as to provide dictionary definitions for both words that make up the phrase to prove just how generic they were.

The company said Apple’s own use of the word app was proof of its generic nature.

"For example, Apple's website encourages consumers to discover 'apps made just for iPad,' and describes its App Store as offering ‘tens of thousands of apps,'" the filing continued.

Apple chief executive (CEO) Steve Jobs was also cited as using the term ‘app stores’ when talking about competitors in the market.

Microsoft pointed to how the press uses the term ‘app store’ to define places that sell software apps.

The firm also said ‘app store’ was user by “many retailers” as part of their own application-selling stores.

"App store is a generic name that Apple should not be permitted to usurp for its exclusive use," the filing read.

"Competitors should be free to use 'app store' to identify their own stores and the services offered in connection with those stores."

As for whether Microsoft has challenged the App Store patent with another agenda in mind, considering its own virtual emporium is called Windows Phone 7 Marketplace, remains a mystery.

The news comes a week after Apple launched the Mac App Store. Over one million apps were downloaded from the store on the first day alone.

“We’re amazed at the incredible response the Mac App Store is getting,” said Jobs.

“Developers have done a great job bringing apps to the store and users are loving how easy and fun the Mac App Store is.”

This article originally appeared at itpro.co.uk

Copyright © ITPro, Dennis Publishing


Microsoft contests Apple App Store patent
"Those a company names @BrissyBoy. That's an entirely different matter."
By Ace
 
 
 
Comments: 11
Bob
Jan 13, 2011 9:14 AM
I guess Windows is too generic to have a tradmark on that too. My house had them 50 years ago and Apple had them 10 years before Micro$oft.
Thysce
Jan 13, 2011 10:28 AM
Bob, your statement is way out of context. House windows are nothing to do with the term 'windows' being used as a software vendor.

Microsoft is right in this case. Though when these days one hears/speaks of 'appstore' it's instantly referred to as apple's app store, this does not entitle apple ownership of the phrase to be exclusive to them. They're taking advantage of a cultural phenomenon.
nate.cochrane
Jan 13, 2011 11:46 AM
@Thysce, I remember when Microsoft strongarmed a small publisher, the maker of the First Electronic Jewish Bookshelf, over the name that was similar to their generically called "Bookshelf" series.

Then, there's the case of Microsoft taking a student to court over his name:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/01/19/microsoft_lawyers_threaten_mike_rowe/
ITrant
Jan 13, 2011 12:03 PM
This from a company that's called its applications 'programs' for decades!

Is there anything Apple does Microsoft doesn't want to appropriate? Next they'll be naming windows versions after cats.

Redmond has a cat, too. A copycat.
Ace
Jan 13, 2011 10:23 PM
Of course Microsoft are merely acting on behalf of Android app vendors. Very decent of them I'd say. The less trading marking and 'owning' of words and phrases, the better. Who cares what the history is, it's the future that needs to be protected.
Mark D
Jan 14, 2011 1:08 PM
@ Ace

+1, well said.
peterhau
Jan 15, 2011 11:30 PM
seems to me that the niggly stuff has come out more since Bill Gates left. The App Store is the result of a cultural phenomenon. Who created the phenomenon? anyone? why, it was apple, with the ipod, the iphone and the ipad.

Tablets have been out for ages, but we never heard of an app store for them, only after Apple innovated did we get the concepts of podcasts, apps, app stores and angry birds.
Ace
Jan 16, 2011 12:48 AM
You miss the point @peterhau. 'App' and 'Store' are very generic. There have been 'cultural phenomenon's quite frequently, but no-one sought to trademark 'Personal Computer' or 'Supermarket' or 'Department Store' etc etc. What is a phenomenon, is businesses wanting to 'protect' every word they ever use in marketing with trademarks and the like.
BrissyBoy
Apr 21, 2011 9:11 AM
The niggly stuff is important and words matter, remember our friends in Redmond pursued a 17yo Canadian student for his domain mikerowesoft. The students name was Mike Rowe as in "Dirty jobs with..."
BrissyBoy
Apr 21, 2011 9:23 AM
The words App & Store are generic terms, however given that there is an admission Thyce, that when one thinks of App Store they think of the Apple App Store for applications serving their range of products. From an Intellectual Property perspective Apple, Microsoft, Telstra, Homestay Network, Woolworths etc and any one else is entitled to protection from people trying to cash in on their commercial efforts.

Ace
Apr 21, 2011 12:08 PM
Those a company names @BrissyBoy. That's an entirely different matter.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australia turns to homegrown drones
Debating the finer points of unmanned aerial vehicle design.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  20%
 
No
  80%
TOTAL VOTES: 518

Vote