Virgin Blue rectifies 'spam' campaign

 

Airline fined $110,000.

Virgin Blue has agreed to overhaul its email marketing practices following allegations that the company ignored recipients' attempts to unsubscribe from its mailing list.

The airline last month entered into an enforceable undertaking with the Australian Communications and Media Authority, following a year-long investigation by the regulator.

Under the agreement (pdf), Virgin Blue would engage an independent third party to assess its email marketing processes and implement any recommended changes within two months of the recommendations being made.

Virgin Blue also promised to pay ACMA $110,000 "in full and final settlement for all alleged breaches of the Spam Act which were [the] subject of the ACMA investigation".

ACMA began investigating "alleged breaches of the Spam Act" by Virgin Blue on 19 November 2009 after receiving complaints from members of the public.

The Act requires companies to comply with a consumer's request to be unsubscribed from commercial emails within five working days.

Virgin Blue believed that "a number of [commercial electronic messages] that were the subject of the ACMA's investigation were sent by mistake", thus complying with Section 16(4) of the Act.

But ACMA's anti-spam team manager Julia Cornwall McKean found the oversight to have been an "ongoing issue" during the investigation.

"We don't think that Virgin Blue was reactive enough," she told iTnews today, describing the airline as "one of the most prolific e-marketers in Australia".

Prior to ACMA's acceptance of the enforceable undertaking, it had identified 10,000 commercial electronic messages that Virgin Blue had sent to consumers who had previously unsubscribed from its mailing list.

Virgin Blue reported that it had conducted spam compliance training last August for personnel involved in sending the offending messages.

It promised to develop a training program to be approved by ACMA within three months, and establish and maintain a policy for handling spam-related complaints.

The company agreed to conduct monthly audits of 10 percent of its email marketing campaigns for 12 months, commencing this month, to monitor its compliance with the Spam Act.

Last March, the airline's sister company Virgin Mobile was fined $22,000 for sending messages to customers who had 'opted out' of its mailing lists.

Cornwall McKean said that Virgin Blue and Virgin Mobile were two separate legal entities and the ACMA investigations were unrelated.

She encouraged businesses and consumers with spam-related concerns to visit http://spam.acma.gov.au.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Virgin Blue rectifies 'spam' campaign
Tags
 
 
 
Top Stories
 
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
Xero prepares for key feature coming in 2015
Dec 19, 2014
Xero users will be able to track how their business is comparing to other Xero users.
More 4G from Optus in Darwin
Nov 21, 2014
Click to see where Optus has expanded coverage to the suburbs near Darwin.
Optus steps up regional 4G coverage
Nov 20, 2014
Once 700Mhz services are working, Optus claims regional users will have a "faster and more ...
This Huawei 4G phone costs $99
Nov 12, 2014
The $99 Huawei Ascend Y550, available through Vodafone, enters the budget market as one of the ...
4G smartphones: Microsoft's Lumia 830
Nov 7, 2014
Microsoft has announced its flagship Windows Phone, the Nokia Lumia 830 4G, will be available in ...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  38%
 
Your insurance company
  4%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  3%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  19%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1897

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?