SAP appeals for Oracle court gag

 

As TomorrowNow trial nears.

Enterprise software maker SAP has filed a motion in a Californian district court to prevent lawyers acting for Oracle from making “extrajudicial statements” until a copyright infringement battle between the two companies is over.

The move by SAP followed an October 8 blog in the New York Times by Joe Nocera, accusing SAP of “brazen theft of intellectual property” and suggesting that the newly-appointed HP chief and former SAP chief Leo Apotheker knew about it. 

SAP’s motion noted that the blog was written by the fiancee of the publicist for Oracle’s law firm in the case.

“As it turns out, and as the newspaper belatedly acknowledged, the author is the fiancée of the publicist for Boies, Schiller & Flexner, Oracle’s lead trial counsel in this case. 

“Although the author denies knowing that his fiancée’s law firm represents Oracle, he does not deny that she was the source of the detailed information and evidence he cites in his article.”

A week prior to the article, Oracle’s defence lawyers had raised concern that jurors would be influenced by media during the trial.

SAP in August conceded that subsidiary TomorrowNow, which it has since shut down, had infringed on Oracle’s copyright. TomorrowNow was alleged to have copied software fixes from Oracle’s website and used them to offer discounted services to Oracle customers. 

SAP has said it was now focused on limiting Oracle’s “vastly overstated” damages claim

The six week trial will commence on November 1. 

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


SAP appeals for Oracle court gag
 
 
 
Top Stories
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
Telstra hands over copper, HFC in new $11bn NBN deal
Value of 2011 deal remains intact.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  38%
 
Your insurance company
  4%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  3%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  19%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1880

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?