SAP appeals for Oracle court gag

 

As TomorrowNow trial nears.

Enterprise software maker SAP has filed a motion in a Californian district court to prevent lawyers acting for Oracle from making “extrajudicial statements” until a copyright infringement battle between the two companies is over.

The move by SAP followed an October 8 blog in the New York Times by Joe Nocera, accusing SAP of “brazen theft of intellectual property” and suggesting that the newly-appointed HP chief and former SAP chief Leo Apotheker knew about it. 

SAP’s motion noted that the blog was written by the fiancee of the publicist for Oracle’s law firm in the case.

“As it turns out, and as the newspaper belatedly acknowledged, the author is the fiancée of the publicist for Boies, Schiller & Flexner, Oracle’s lead trial counsel in this case. 

“Although the author denies knowing that his fiancée’s law firm represents Oracle, he does not deny that she was the source of the detailed information and evidence he cites in his article.”

A week prior to the article, Oracle’s defence lawyers had raised concern that jurors would be influenced by media during the trial.

SAP in August conceded that subsidiary TomorrowNow, which it has since shut down, had infringed on Oracle’s copyright. TomorrowNow was alleged to have copied software fixes from Oracle’s website and used them to offer discounted services to Oracle customers. 

SAP has said it was now focused on limiting Oracle’s “vastly overstated” damages claim

The six week trial will commence on November 1. 

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


SAP appeals for Oracle court gag
 
 
 
Top Stories
Myer CIO named retailer's new chief executive
Richard Umbers to lead data-driven retail strategy.
 
Empty terminals and mountains of data
Qantas CIO Luc Hennekens says no-one is safe from digital disruption.
 
BoQ takes $10m hit on Salesforce CRM
Regulatory hurdles end cloud pilot.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  35%
 
Your insurance company
  5%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  9%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  4%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  18%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  15%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  7%
TOTAL VOTES: 4099

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?

   |   View results
I support shutting down the OAIC.
  26%
 
I DON'T support shutting the OAIC.
  74%
TOTAL VOTES: 1397

Vote