Conroy to re-introduce Telstra split bill

 

Hopes second time lucky.

The Federal Government has re-introduced draft telecommunications laws to parliament in the hope they will pass the Senate before its make-up changes in mid-2011.

The Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) bill - informally known as the Telstra split bill - was first introduced to parliament last year.

It later passed a Senate Committee review but faced criticism over sections of the proposed legislation that forced Telstra's break-up and punished the carrier if it did not agree to separation.

Key independent senators had called for the bill to be amended and re-introduced for debate after the $11 billion Telstra-NBN Co deal was struck - but the Federal Election delayed that re-introduction.

Communications Minister Stephen Conroy foreshadowed the re-introduction of the proposed laws at a Senate Estimates hearing late last night.

"It went through caucus today," Conroy told Senators.

Conroy and Prime Minister Julia Gillard fronted a media conference in Canberra to announce the re-introduction of the draft laws.

It was hoped that the combination of Government amendments and Telstra's support for structural separation would combine in favour of the laws being passed.

"This is a bill that was tied 38-38 in the senate," Conroy said.

"One of the minor parties indicated they wanted to see a deal struck [with Telstra] before they would support this. Now that there is Telstra support, I think there is a fresh chance it can pass the Senate before 30 June [2011 when Election 2010 changes come into effect]."

Telstra chief David Thodey supported the re-introduction of the draft laws.

"We believe the interests of Telstra shareholders would be best served by the Bill being passed this year so that a definitive agreement on our involvement in the NBN can be reached quickly," Thodey said.

"We also strongly recommend that consideration be given to further amendments that guarantee appropriate checks on regulatory decision making and bring telecommunications into line with other industries."

Thodey said he was confident the bill provided "the mechanisms needed to secure agreements with the Government and NBN Co regarding Telstra's participation in the NBN and that it provided much greater certainty on access to fourth generation wireless spectrum."

Good for consumers

Conroy said the laws were about the "important microeconomic reform of structural separation" of Telstra, enabling a leveling of the wholesale market he said would allow consumers to "begin to see the sort of retail competition" being seen by customers of the Tasmanian NBN.

"If you think it's an accident that Telstra and all other ISPs in Australia are offering larger download limits, it's not an accident - it's happening because of the threat of competition from the entry of the NBN," Conroy said.

"We're already seeing [broadband] packages in the market that are affected by what's happening as the NBN rolls out to the rest of Australia."

Conroy also attacked Opposition communications spokesman Malcolm Turnbull over his introduction of a private members bill that could delay the rollout of the NBN.

"Let's recognise the Opposition stunts for exactly what they are," he said, accusing Turnbull of "wilfully delaying" the NBN rollout.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Conroy to re-introduce Telstra split bill
"MerariSchroeder, plenty of you know your broadband schemes, and your Wireless adventure on Whirlpool Forums. A CBA is done like any other, through the Company, in this case, the NBNCo, not ..."
By mad1k5
 
 
 
Comments: 5
scan06disk
Oct 20, 2010 1:36 PM
Telstra + Conroy + Filter = Yo-ho-ho !
FLashy
Oct 21, 2010 12:09 AM
It all sounds a bit suspect, Costello just sold off a large parcel of Telstra shares, then Conroy wants to push for a split-up of the same company.
They did the same last time didn't they with 'absolutely no collusion', between departments.
Pull the other one Labor.
MerariSchroeder
Oct 21, 2010 11:14 AM
[Conroy] "wilfully delaying"

What a load of garbage! It will be "wilfully delaying" only if the sought CBA uncovers nasty surprises - which is likely given Conroys reaction.
Maxxi2
Oct 21, 2010 4:08 PM
Telstra + Conroy + NBN = Libs in opposition for 6 years...

Turnbull + Accusations + Gretch = Typical

Libs + NBN strategy + influence = Exterminate!Exterminate!Exterminate!Exterminate!Exterminate!...

Quigley + NBN Business Plan + Imminent = Reality

Australia + NBN + Progress = Competitive future

Quigley + Telecoms + Experise = Embarrassingly dull and bored Lib Senators making a mockery of Senate hearings...

Internet + Filter + Australia = Go ask Telstra, Optus and iPrimus
mad1k5
Nov 2, 2010 6:13 PM
MerariSchroeder, plenty of you know your broadband schemes, and your Wireless adventure on Whirlpool Forums.

A CBA is done like any other, through the Company, in this case, the NBNCo, not through the shareholder(s) of the company (in this case, the Commonwealth/the Gov).

(Which is already completed btw)

It's no different from any other project.

If Private Members Bill is introduced by the Opposition, it can seriously hamper the Construction And/Or Operation of the NBN (limiting resources available to NBN by Government halting funds(and starving the NBN of funds), which could delay mass-rollout.

I remember the same arguement over the Implementation Study, something along the effects of
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/175012,economists-analysts-dispute-nbn-study-numbers.aspx
"He blamed the Government for failing to conduct a cost-benefit analysis from the outset -- despite lobbying from the Business Council of Australia and Opposition -- and concluded that taxpayers should demand a $25 million refund."

These same group of people, arguing that it's false, lies, and so on, and that it should get a refund.

The BCA and Opposition have been making noises from the get go about the NBN.

Do we really want that?

Let me ask anyone who reads, was there a CBA for OPEL Agreement between Optus and Elders? which would have costed at $2 Billion dollars ($1 Billion from the government?)

It Pisses me off about the continual rubbish I hear from people, yet when Opposition came along with OPEL, there was nothing of sorts of arguement.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 495

Vote