Turnbull OK with Telstra separation

 

Conciliatory tones from meeting with NBN Co chief.

Opposition communications spokesman Malcolm Turnbull said today that he would not object to the separation of Telstra to resolve problems caused by vertical integration in the telco sector.

In an apparent turnaround from earlier Coalition policy, which had seen the party delay debate on a Telstra separation bill and take separation off the table in its own broadband policy, Turnbull told the CommsDay Summit in Melbourne that he was in favour of separation to resolve competition concerns in the industry rather than the alternative - the NBN - which he described as "overbuilding and trashing" Telstra's network.

"The Government claims it will promote competition by eliminating the vertical integration of Telstra. It does this by overbuilding the entire Telstra CAN [copper access network], at public expense, and by contracting with Telstra to decommission its own network," Turnbull said.

"There is not an end, however, to monopoly. There is simply an end to vertical integration. 

"But in response we must recognise that if vertical integration is indeed the problem, then a structural or functional separation is the answer.
 
"In short – if vertical integration is the problem, the NBN is not the answer unless you believe in taking a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

"If Telstra were to decide to separate its network business as a utility... I certainly wouldn't object to that."

Meeting went well?

Turnbull and NBN Co chief executive Mike Quigley were cautiously positive when asked separately about the outcome of the first meeting between the pair last week.

"I think it went... pretty well," Quigley said.

"It was good, it was fine," Turnbull said.

Turnbull said he learned that NBN Co "hadn't prepared a business case [or] presented their business case even to their own board".

NBN Co today said the business case would be handed to the Government by the end of the month.

The conciliatory tone was short-lived, however, as Turnbull attacked Quigley for not justifying the costs of the network during a presentation to the summit earlier today.
 
"You've just had the chief executive of this business stand up and has not sought to justify the investment in financial terms at all," Turnbull said.

"He doesn't regard that as his job, frankly, because he says 'I was hired to build a network to connect 93 percent of Australians to fibre to the home, capable of delivering at least 100 Mbps...' So he's getting on with it.

"Where is the investment going to be justified?"

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Turnbull OK with Telstra separation
"Nice to see one other sensible contributor! Sydneyla has it right all the way. He does say though..."At this point I am not sure that Malcolm Turnbull knows what he is doing..." Frankly, in my ..."
By epimetheus
 
 
 
Comments: 11
realitybites
Oct 13, 2010 6:27 PM
"Opposition communications spokesman Malcolm Turnbull said today that he would not object to the separation of Telstra to resolve problems caused by vertical integration in the telco sector."

thunk... That was me falling off my chair :)

ohh wait.. I assume he is speaking on behalf of his party? Or is this just his personal opinion? Never can tell these days.
Mordd
Oct 13, 2010 8:56 PM
If this is official liberal policy, then its news to me and I think to most of the liberal party as well. I too almost fell over gobsmacked when I read this in the paper today.

Edited by Mordd: 13/10/2010 08:57:25 PM
sydneyla
Oct 14, 2010 8:30 AM
This NBN plan could easily degenerate into to biggest disaster ever seen in Australia's history.

People must understand the enormity of the build and the limited resources, both financial and human, that will make the delivery (on planned schedule)impossible. Where will the NBN Co get the tradesmen needed to connect 5000 premises per day for seven years?

Neighbourhoods will not accept overhead cabling and even with the use of Telstra ducts the roll-out will have delays. It is not beyond possibility that the cost of the NBN system could be in excess of 100 billion dollars and be a financial disaster for Australians.

At this point I am not sure that Malcolm Turnbull knows what he is doing but he is certainly better than the Smith/Robb double that made an absolute hash of the Abbott opposition plan. Hopefully sanity will prevail and Australians will get a satisfactory fast broadband network at a cost that is bearable for taxpayers.
dubious
Oct 14, 2010 9:00 AM
Who cares if it's coalition policy? It's fair, logical and redresses the worst privatisation stuff-up of the Howard era
Tailgator
Oct 14, 2010 9:54 AM
"If Telstra were to decide to separate its network business as a utility... I certainly wouldn't object to that."

Note that - If Telstra were to decide ... It has nothing to do with a change in Liberal Party policy and it can only be assumed they will not instigate moves for separation.
realitybites
Oct 14, 2010 10:19 AM
Yeah, I had missed that sentence. However just a bit earlier on we have this:
"Turnbull told the CommsDay Summit in Melbourne that he was in favour of separation to resolve competition concerns in the industry rather than the alternative..."

Mr Turnbull, is it that difficult to be specific about your parties policies?

@dubious - I care because I vote based on policy, not party. I think you'll find most thinking people do.

Edited by realitybites: 14/10/2010 10:50:38 AM
mad1k5
Oct 14, 2010 2:27 PM
Is this their altered version of a broadband policy? And What happened to that marvious policy of Forcing entire country to use a new seperated Wireless NETWORK?

Please Turnbull, Please Explain.

Reailitybites,

The Coalition have never been specific on their policies, just ask their boss on the 12 point action plan and so on.
umbria
Oct 14, 2010 2:54 PM
The NBN is certainly a sledgehammer. But the social disadvantage of many in regional Australia and consequent unsustainable growth of our biggest cities is far more serious than a "nut".

We have already tried two handyman's hammers with OPEL and NBN Mark I, and abandoned them both as unfit for this purpose.

A sledgehammer is the right approach, and Mike Quigley is simply getting on with the job of building it.
Ezy2Confuze
Oct 14, 2010 3:38 PM
I guess the biggest cost for the NBN rollout will be the labour itself, it's not like installing pink batts in a home for instance, the unions have been very quiet so far but I bet as soon as the first 6 months of the main roll out has passed, we are going to start seeing stop works and pay disputes just like in the mining industry. It's not like just anyone can work with fibre cabling after all.

I am also wondering, whilst the AU$ is high, are NBN Co purchasing equipment now, where it makes sense to buy whilst we are so close to parity wiht the US$
sydneyla
Oct 14, 2010 3:38 PM
Hey Tailgator would not the fact that Telstra, under its Heads of Agreement with the NBN Co, would no longer have a Wholesale facility automatically remove the call for Telstra to separate?
epimetheus
Oct 14, 2010 7:59 PM
Nice to see one other sensible contributor! Sydneyla has it right all the way. He does say though..."At this point I am not sure that Malcolm Turnbull knows what he is doing..." Frankly, in my opinion, he never has! He also states...."Australians will get a satisfactory fast broadband network at a cost that is bearable for taxpayers." Sorry, but since the thing was conjured up and cobbled together by a bunch of union fanatics he is urinating into the maelstrom!
BTW,just what is "virtual integration".....sounds like something dirty!
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 493

Vote