Australia heralds ACTA "breakthrough"

 

Treaty almost there, text released.

Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) has sung the praises of a new anti-piracy agreement between 27 nations, releasing the draft text [pdf] overnight.

The final round of negotiations for the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) were held in Tokyo, Japan, over a ten-day stretch last month.

US officials hailed the agreement as a success for rights holders, but critics said the result was a "far cry" from the tough approach the US had hoped for.

"State of the art" provisions do not include harsh anti-digital rights management (DRM) circumvention penalties or the controversial three strikes rule initially proposed, which would have forced ISPs to monitor their networks throw repeat copyright offenders off the network.

Instead, parties agreed to "promote cooperative efforts within the business community to effectively address copyright or related rights infringement" while preserving competition, freedom of expression, fair process and privacy.

The draft permitted the introduction of a mechanism for a competent authority to force an ISP to hand over subscriber details to a rights holder.

However, any rights holder seeking access to subscriber information must have filed a "legally sufficient claim of infringement".

"Note that neither of these provisions create new substantive obligations," ACTA critic and Canadian law professor Dr Michael Geist commented today.

"The first provision requires an effort to promote cooperative efforts, not new laws. The second provision is permissive - a party may provide new laws, but is not required to do so."

US ACTA ambassador Ron Kirk, however, said the text reflected "tremendous progress" in the fight against counterfeiting and piracy.

Gigi Sohn of the Washington DC-based public interest group and ACTA critic, Public Knowledge, claimed the text "should be seen as a qualified victory for those who want to protect the digital rights of consumers around the world."

Sohn was pleased with the flexibility the final version of the agreement offered to signatories and with the removal of "the most egregious provisions" regarding DRM anti-circumvention and ISP liability.

Rights group sees positive side

That the harshest controls proposed under ACTA never made it to the final version, however, was not viewed as a failure by rights holder groups.

"It may not be a precise roadmap, but it is a powerful expression of a common vision and unity of purpose," the US Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA)'s vice president Neil Turkewitz said.

Turkewitz was pleased that "online theft" was officially recognised by parties and that it now had an opportunity to influence the local implementation of the agreement .

No less benign, says Pirate Party

Pirate Party Australia president Rodney Serkowski said that the draft text was "in some respects a slightly better document than previous leaked drafts, with some sections being watered down."

"However, at first glance, we don't perceive this draft as being any more benign," he said.

"Changes in the document have only occurred due to significant pressures from NGOs, political parties and concerned lawmakers across the world making countless declarations and objections to both the content and the process based on information gathered from leaked documents."

Australia's response

Throughout the ACTA process, talks have been held behind closed doors. Australia has been represented by DFAT, the Attorney General's department and IP Australia.

DFAT reported that "only a few remaining issues now await resolution" before parties sign the treaty, which had been under discussion for some three years.

The department has long promised iTnews readers that Australia's interest in the treaty would not extend to making any changes to domestic law

Trade Minister Dr Craig Emerson said the ACTA draft text "reflects" Australian laws and standards, "which we now want to see adopted by other countries.

"ACTA is important because we are concerned at the scale and growth of the global trade in counterfeit and pirated goods," he said.

Emerson said that a decision on ratifying the treaty "will only be taken after full public and parliamentary scrutiny.

"ACTA will create a more secure trading environment for Australia's creative and knowledge-intensive industries by ensuring copyright and trademarks are enforced in a number of important foreign markets."

"This is good for our film and music industries, our computer programmers, our authors, and for the protection of famous Australian brands," he said.

Arts Minister Simon Crean also "welcomed the breakthrough.

"ACTA will provide for the same strong and balanced approach to copyright enforcement that Australia has at home," Crean said.

 

The ACTA was now due to be signed within days by 27 countries including Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, Korea, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland and the United States.

Critics of the agreement had raised concerns throughout the process that rights holders (the recording and movie industries) had lobbied these governments to create laws that could have adverse impacts on the rights of citizens and the business models of intermediaries such as ISPs and telcos, web hosts and search engines, or universities.

 

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Australia heralds ACTA "breakthrough"
"If the likes of the RIAA and MPAA are happy with the outcome, the citizens must be getting dumped on. This will have zero impact on copyright infringements and give extra power for abuse to those ..."
By Fungyo
 
 
 
Comments: 9
schneider
Oct 7, 2010 9:46 AM
Should they also require the rights holder to supply the material in a digital form at a price which would discourage piracy in the first place? The music industry tried to fight this and finally realised after many years of suing 15 year old kids that there was money to be made on the internet "thingy". If the Movie industry had the same idea we might never need any of these laws! Something like Netflix in Australia would spell the end here! It actually works out CHEAPER then pirating! This is because you need the server to store the movies and the hard drives. You are talking thousands of dollars! If instead you could stream ever movie for say $20 per month it would take 10 years to pay of the server!
rycrozier
Oct 7, 2010 9:49 AM
+1. I suspect you'll find very few people who disagree with you, schneider.
evilsync
Oct 7, 2010 10:50 AM
Say goodbye to your rights. Whats the bet people will spoof emails to get peoples details.
HubertCumberdale
Oct 7, 2010 12:14 PM
I love the way these "democratic" countries have their secret little copyright meetings without consulting their electorates. It's ok through the pirates will continue to make unauthorised copies of movies & music without consulting them, all is well...

One wonders why no one has come up with a viable solution to appease both sides though, oh wait because I am a visionary I've already done that, let's see how many years it takes for it to catch on.
anonymous
Oct 7, 2010 1:02 PM

"DFAT... has long promised iTnews readers that Australia's interest in the treaty would not extend to making any changes to domestic law."

That's a L-A-W, core promise, is it? Not like when Conboy said government censorship would be optional for users, then after he became minister declared it would be a mandatory imposition.
longsword
Oct 7, 2010 2:08 PM
Why are we signing this when we're not going to make changes to domestic law to reflect it? Doesn't make sense.

Ah of course it's like any policy relating to IT with Labour, they don't have a clue.
Ace
Oct 7, 2010 5:00 PM
Because @longsward, you don't need new laws when the laws we have already do the job. The agreement allows people to agree on ethics so that we can tell each off very sternly when required.
Johnny
Oct 8, 2010 9:30 AM
"US officials hailed the agreement as a success for rights holders, but critics said the result was a "far cry" from the tough approach the US had hoped for."

It's not the US that hoped for this, its the people we buy movies from (MPAAm etc)that REALLY want these fascist measures to come in place (i.e skipping the court, right to the punishment!)

If MPAA had their way the world would be a fascist state.
Fungyo
Oct 8, 2010 2:50 PM
If the likes of the RIAA and MPAA are happy with the outcome, the citizens must be getting dumped on. This will have zero impact on copyright infringements and give extra power for abuse to those swimming in the money.
We'll just have to wait and see what abuse comes from these crooks with this new treaty. Unfortunately, most people will be ignorant to the destructive nature of these treaties and believe everything is peachy and their favourite artists is being looked after. Blind fools.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  20%
 
No
  80%
TOTAL VOTES: 487

Vote