Ballmer: Patent laws need changing

 

Targets UK and US laws.

While patent laws are helpful, they need changing both in the UK and the US, according to Microsoft's chief executive (CEO) Steve Ballmer.

Giving a lecture at the London School of Economics and Political Science today, Ballmer said, by and large, patent laws were crafted in the days preceding the dawn of modern IT.

“Is the patent system perfect? The answer is of course not,” Ballmer said.

“We think patent law ought to be reformed to reflect modern times,” he added. “Patent reform needs to be taken up on this side and on the US side of the Atlantic.”

The tech world has been rife with patent wars involving some of the biggest companies in the business.

Just this week it emerged Microsoft had filed a complaint against Motorola for nine alleged patent infringements in the latter's Android phones.

US law permitted the Redmond giant to sue the phone manufacturer rather than the OS developer Google.

Ballmer told attendees that the tech community is better off with a patent system in place, even if it does need altering.

“On balance, I think the patent system today helps and yet I think patent reform should be taken up. Two of the biggest generators of patents – the pharmaceutical business and the IT business – neither industry existed when modern patent law was written,” the Microsoft chief said.

When it comes to talking about reform, large enterprises such as Microsoft, small businesses and inventors should all be involved, Ballmer added.

This article originally appeared at itpro.co.uk

Copyright © ITPro, Dennis Publishing


Ballmer: Patent laws need changing
""Ballmer told attendees that the tech community is better off with a patent system in place, even if it does need altering." With regard to hardware, there is a case. With regard to software it ..."
By Ace
 
 
 
Comments: 1
Ace
Oct 6, 2010 2:31 PM
"Ballmer told attendees that the tech community is better off with a patent system in place, even if it does need altering."

With regard to hardware, there is a case. With regard to software it is rubbish. Copyright is, and has always been there to protect authors. Patents for software are used for oppression, and that is all. Microsoft's latest case Motorola is a great example.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  20%
 
No
  80%
TOTAL VOTES: 486

Vote