Oracle releases its own Linux kernel

 

Slams partner Red Hat over slow updates.

View larger image
Crowds at Moscone Center. Some 40,000 in attendance.
View larger image
Oracle paid the city of San Francisco to block off two streets in the financial district to ...
View larger image
Oracle magnate, Larry Ellison.

See all pictures here »

Oracle chief executive Larry Ellison has announced the release of the vendor's own Linux kernel, slamming its existing Linux partner Red Hat for being too slow to update the version traditionally used by Oracle customers.

Oracle had, for the last four years, offered a Red Hat-compatible Linux distribution - the Oracle branded 'Unbreakable Linux' - and claimed to have 5,000 customers using the operating system.

Last night at Oracle OpenWorld, Ellison announced the release of Oracle's own 'Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel', which will be offered as a choice alongside its Red Hat compatible distribution and the Solaris operating system.

Ellison criticised Red Hat for being too slow to incorporate community improvements in its distribution.

"There are issues with us maintaining 100 percent compatibility with Red Hat Linux," Ellison said.

Ellison said that Red Hat "adopts community enhancements very slowly" and is currently offering partners like Oracle a version of Linux that is "four years behind the mainline."

"It's four years behind the times," Ellison claimed. "We can't afford to be four years behind in software."

Ellison said Oracle felt it could provide a Linux kernel of its own with superior performance and reliability.

"We were having real problems with the Linux OS not offering the performance we needed," he said.

"[So] we had to change the kernel," he said. "We had to change Linux."

Ellison promised that its Linux kernel deliver "dramatically better performance that you will get from Red Hat". It would also be more vigorously tested for compatibility with Oracle products.

But he also took care to comfort those of Oracle's 5,000 customers already using the Red Hat compatible version.

"We are going to keep Red Hat compatibility for the long term," he said. "We are going to keep that commitment, but deliver you the option of running the Unbreakable Kernel also."

Red Hat has been contacted for comment.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


"realitybites wrote: Interesting bug report.. CentOS kernel after yum update is: 2.6.18-194.11.3.el5 It says it's resolved tho? Unless I'm not reading it right, which is entirely possible :) ..."
By deteego
 
 
 
Comments: 7
djzort
Sep 21, 2010 8:44 AM
this is hardly news worthy, every distribution releases their own patched kernel. even centos provides a RH comparable and an enhanced kernel.

rh are way too slow though, but they are held back by how slowly RH certified ISV's bother to update their software. ie second rate proprietary linux software.
deteego
Sep 21, 2010 12:14 PM
Its an argument of stability vs new features

There is a reason why distros like debian 'stable' or redhat are years behind, its been (almost) proven with empiric evidence that the kernel (among other software) is bug free. If you want a newer redhat with just released features, its called Fedora, use it

I just updated to the latest linux kernel 3 weeks ago, it has a regression where it will throw a kernel panic if you have 2+ sata drives connected. It still has not been fixed. Definitely do not need that happening

Edited by deteego: 21/9/2010 05:41:46 PM
Ezy2Confuze
Sep 21, 2010 3:10 PM
Ellison criticised Red Hat for being too slow to incorporate community improvements in its distribution.

Geez Larry, talk about calling the kettle black, what with the way Oracle/SUN essentially left the OpenSolaris movement in the dark for so long.
realitybites
Sep 22, 2010 3:44 PM
@deteego
Thats interesting. What kernel did you upgrade to? I did a build last week for a customer which contained 4 sata drives and they wanted RAID10 with LVM. I used CentOS 5.5 and had no kernel issues at all. Bear in mind this was a new build and not an upgrade.
deteego
Sep 22, 2010 4:33 PM
realitybites wrote:
@deteego
Thats interesting. What kernel did you upgrade to? I did a build last week for a customer which contained 4 sata drives and they wanted RAID10 with LVM. I used CentOS 5.5 and had no kernel issues at all. Bear in mind this was a new build and not an upgrade.

2.6.35-4 (revision 4)
Here is the bug report (its happened since 2.6.35 first revision)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16606

(Im using archlinux, which I believe uses the vanilla kernel modified for generic i686/X86-64)

Edited by deteego: 22/9/2010 04:34:20 PM
realitybites
Sep 22, 2010 5:32 PM
Interesting bug report..
CentOS kernel after yum update is: 2.6.18-194.11.3.el5

It says it's resolved tho? Unless I'm not reading it right, which is entirely possible :)

[edit] Just did a yum update and kernel is now 2.6.18-194.11.4.el5, so kernel update since last week.

Edited by realitybites: 22/9/2010 05:38:03 PM
deteego
Sep 22, 2010 5:44 PM
realitybites wrote:
Interesting bug report..
CentOS kernel after yum update is: 2.6.18-194.11.3.el5

It says it's resolved tho? Unless I'm not reading it right, which is entirely possible :)

[edit] Just did a yum update and kernel is now 2.6.18-194.11.4.el5, so kernel update since last week.

Edited by realitybites: 22/9/2010 05:38:03 PM


It got resolved in 2.6.35-5, which will be available in the very near future

2.6.18 is a fairly old kernel (if I am reading that right), but then again, Archlinux is a bleeding edge distro. The regression got introduced in 2.6.35-1

Edited by deteego: 22/9/2010 05:45:18 PM
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
Top Stories
NRMA builds pre-emptive insurance claims tool
Google Earth integration mulled.
 
Optus buys Perth-based vividwireless
Plans hybrid TD/FD-LTE mobile broadband network.
 
Health rolls out Windows 7 thin clients
To deliver 4500 virtual desktops by May.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  85%
 
No
  15%
TOTAL VOTES: 391

Vote