Microsoft unveils IE9 beta

 

Standards and speed to fend off browser rivals.

Microsoft has released the beta for its next generation browser, Internet Explorer 9.

Aside from the already announced support for HTML5 and hardware accleration, Microsoft unveiled a clean new user interface, clever Windows 7 interface, and new security tools.

The user interface was stripped down to leave sites front and central. “From our point of view, the browser is the stage,” said head of IE Dean Hachamovitch at the launch event in San Francisco. “Sites on the web are the stars of the show.”

The browser was intergrated with Windows 7, to take advantage of the tools in the operating system.

Hachamovitch noted that 33 percent of Windows users had pinned something to the taskbar, but just 4 percent had added anything to the favourites list.

He claimed that 40 percent used Aero Snap to view windows side by side, but just nine percent had more than eight tabs open at once. “There are huge gaps in usage patterns,” he said.

With that in mind, IE9 users would be able to pin sites directly to the taskbar in Windows 7, so pages could be accessed without opening the browser first.

IE9 also allowed websites to create 'jumplists', so users could go directly to tasks via the site - such as sending an email, accepting a friend invite, or going directly to a news story - without working their way through the site's interface first.

Such sites would also pull in notifications, alerting users to messages directly through the OS.

Another new tool was the 'One Box', which kept track of sites visited to make site suggestions as users type -- without automatically sending that data to a search engine, Microsoft noted, taking a bit of a dig at rival Google. "The address bar is respectful of privacy," he said.

As previously announced, IE9 supported hardware accleration, with its Chakra engine leveraging multicore CPUs. Microsoft claimed to be the first to use full HTML 5 hardware acceleration, using the GPU for graphics processing - a goal Chrome and Firefox were both working on.

Microsoft also highlighted the HTML5 support, showing off a host of websites created by partners.

The company also claimed to have sorted out the 'back' button, so users navigating within a site's own inbuilt tabs would also be able to use the browser controls without confusing matters - a revelation that won applause from developers in the crowd.

Security

Microsoft said the browser was not just cleaner and faster, but safer. A new download manager tool, SmartScreen filter, looked for malware in files, showing a warning only when necessary rather than popping up warning windows for all downloads.

Files known to be safe would simply be downloaded, saving users from getting "fatigue" and blindly approving everything.

Hachamovitch said the "application reputation" was a nice way to describe "stranger danger for downloads". When the system asked users if they were sure about a file, "it is very clear and uses human language to explain the risks," he said.

IE9 also brought an 'Add-On Performance Adviser' to let users know when add-ons were slowing down the browser. "It makes it very clear what’s going on, and what the user can do,” Hachamovitch said, adding that 75 percent of all IE crashes were caused by add-ons.

The new version also included tab isolation as well as crash and hang recovery.

The IE9 beta can be downloaded here.

This article originally appeared at pcpro.co.uk

Copyright © PC Pro, Dennis Publishing


Microsoft unveils IE9 beta
"Being of sound mind - well, almost, I thought I would put this wonder-browser to the test. I d/l a file of some 2.4Mb and tried to install it. First off it connected to the 'net to "download ..."
By epimetheus
 
 
 
Comments: 5
Bob
Sep 16, 2010 4:59 PM
Sounds like a new type of buggy whip. Does anyone actually use IE that isn't forced to?
realitybites
Sep 21, 2010 11:56 PM
Is it still built into the OS ?
I haven't used MS products for a while now, so wouldn't know personally.

"Hachamovitch said, adding that 75 percent of all IE crashes were caused by add-ons."

This just made me laugh... of course it is, what else could it be ?
deteego
Sep 22, 2010 12:08 AM
Bob wrote:
Sounds like a new type of buggy whip. Does anyone actually use IE that isn't forced to?


The average joe who doesn't know any better (IE still has like ~60% market share iirc)

Edited by deteego: 22/9/2010 12:09:11 AM
Graeme Harrison (prof at-symbol post.harvard.edu)
Sep 22, 2010 8:17 AM
Whenever I hear that Microsoft is about to implement a new standard (in this case HTML5) and at the same time seeks to incorporate the product into the OS, my mind naturally drifts to that famous Microsoft policy wrt standards "Embrace, Extend & Extinguish" - as best described at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend_and_extinguish

.... The more things change, the more they remain the same. Can't every country follow the EU ruling that requires a choice of browser upon first use of any pre-installed operating system, just to level the field?
epimetheus
Sep 22, 2010 8:11 PM
Being of sound mind - well, almost, I thought I would put this wonder-browser to the test. I d/l a file of some 2.4Mb and tried to install it. First off it connected to the 'net to "download update files needed for the install". It only got some 60% of that process completed then stopped. "Never say die" I thought but this glitch occurred each of the four times that I tried!
I never had this problem with Firefox and it merely serves to confirm my belief in MS products.........the belief that they will always be a load of rubbish!
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  20%
 
No
  80%
TOTAL VOTES: 507

Vote