ACMA inquiry sees proposal to cap telco "caps"

 

Give users control over telco spending.

Telcos would be forced to seek permission to service customers beyond contracted "cap" amounts under a proposal by the Brotherhood of St Laurence.

The community organisation today released its submission [PDF] to the Australian Communications and Media Authority's (ACMA) inquiry into complaints-handling within the telecommunications sector.

Submissions to the inquiry closed last week.

The Brotherhood was critical of telco price models and of the trend towards "value cap" plans that could leave customers with large bills if they unknowingly exceeded the capped amount provided by the contract.

It said the cap price structure used by telcos could "be viewed as somewhat predatory" and that charges incurred after a cap was exceeded did "not at all reflect the cost of service provision, and was evidence of profiteering which must be curbed".

"The profiteering preys on the fact that mobile use by customers is often irregular (family emergencies and other life events may cause someone to make occasional heavy use of their mobile), and for this customers should not be punished or taken advantage of," the Brotherhood said.

It recommended that telcos be "required to inform customers of their level of expenditure at regular intervals to ensure that they do not receive an unexpectedly high bill".

Warnings should also be sent about 48 hours before a user was to exceed their cap based on their service usage, the Brotherhood said.

It also called for "a requirement that use beyond that covered under the ‘cap' only be granted after confirmation from the user".

"That is, a customer would be required to opt in to acknowledge that subsequent use will cause them to exceed their cap and will incur higher charges," the Brotherhood said.

"It is envisaged that this requirement could be removed at the customer's request, but not for mobile phones being used by minors."

The Brotherhood also recommended that a government-funded website be established to allow people to easily compare telecommunications plans.

It cited the Your Choice website in Victoria, which targeted the energy sector, as an example of the site it wanted set up.

"Telecommunications companies consequently bombard the consumer with confusing and flashy advertising rather than with useful information concerning how and why their product/service offering is superior to competitors' offerings," the Brotherhood said.

"The competitive telecommunications environment is, at present, akin to a debate in which the winner is the voice which is loudest rather than the one which conveys the most intelligent information."

The Brotherhood also called for small telecommunications debt to be excluded from personal credit reports to prevent them causing financial hardship to disadvantaged Australians.

What do you think? Should telcos be forced to "cap" the credit limit on their "capped" plans?

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


ACMA inquiry sees proposal to cap telco "caps"
"It's truly incredible that these punitive charges on excess still exist. When I saw 15c flagfall, 15c/30 sec, and 100 days credit expiry on the Woolies mobile product last year I quickly realised ..."
By umbria
 
 
 
Comments: 7
pawzlion
Sep 15, 2010 2:46 PM
Dear God yes ! And can that please cover data caps as well ? I mean, why is it that my first 200meg of data costs me $10, but once I go over that 200meg it suddenly costs $500 per gigabyte ? Talk about the price not reflecting the actual cost. That's just ridiculous. Data costs Telstra pennies, yet they charge like a wounded bull when you go over your limit. This /has/ to be stopped !
cootified
Sep 15, 2010 3:53 PM
I dont think telcos should do anything that makes them divert the profit channel somehwere else so more people will whinge.
A business will make its money no matter what.
Remember when people complained about SMSs being 25c?
No?
Well the funny thing is, the cost of SMS has generally gone up but no one notices?
dbareis
Sep 15, 2010 3:53 PM
I don't think this goes anywhere near enough. Any contact you enter into (for anything not just phones) which is not for a fixed known amount should allow you to specify the maximum amount that can be charged without them contacting you for agreement to go over.
djzort
Sep 15, 2010 7:06 PM
sadly, australias telcos cannot seem to self regulate, perhaps this is because of foreign controllers? clarity and regulation is so desperately needed in the telco market that its unbelievable it hasnt become a political issue. whats even more unbelievable is that people buy products they cant understand.
Russell
Sep 15, 2010 10:20 PM
They should be showing the costs of there products in useful terms such as the way supermarkets are now displaying costs of products in $/kg etc.

I have never told anyone "I just talked to mum for $7." Yet they all describe there caps in terms of dollars. I want to know $/min, $/sms, $/gigabyte. And I like the idea of not being able to exceed a cap, or even better, no cap, just a flat rate.
Mordd
Sep 15, 2010 10:23 PM
100% agree with that proposal, I hope it gets proper consideration.
umbria
Sep 16, 2010 11:38 AM
It's truly incredible that these punitive charges on excess still exist. When I saw 15c flagfall, 15c/30 sec, and 100 days credit expiry on the Woolies mobile product last year I quickly realised this would work for us, which it has (we pay $20 a quarter for each mobile).

That's exactly what @Russell is advocating, flat unit prices. But I also expected the big telcos to soon offer similar plans, which they have not in general.

Yep, it's time for the ACMA bods to earn their salaries and adopt the Brotherhood of St Laurence proposal!
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  20%
 
No
  80%
TOTAL VOTES: 507

Vote