ACTA leak cuts out ISP liability

 

iiNet vs AFACT trial rises in importance.

Countries that were party to an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) may now be relieved of the obligation to impose third-party liability on internet service providers, according to leaked notes.

Knowledge Ecology International claimed to have obtained a text copy of the last round of talks in Washington DC.

Although still studying the 29-page document, Lowndes Jordan intellectual property lawyer Rick Shera said that chapter four of the draft treaty, Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in the Digital Environment had changed "considerably".

In particular, he said in a blog post, the leaked text appeared to remove the requirement for countries to impose third-party liability on ISPs and other service providers.

A "three strikes" rule had reportedly been on the agenda at previous ACTA discussions.

Such a rule would require ISPs to disconnect users suspected of file-sharing on more than two occasions and free up a rights holder - such as the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT), for example - from having to prove that an ISP like iiNet had 'authorised' a subscriber's downloads to force the ISP to take active steps to stop the problem.

"As a result [of the removal of liability], we are left with a relatively benign set of provisions (although there is obviously still negotiation going on around access to subscriber information, which needs to be watched)," Shera said.

An ACTA treaty without the third-party liability provisions also placed further legal importance on the outcome of the ongoing battle between iiNet and AFACT, he said.

The latest text leak came after the United States opposed an official release of the meeting text.

Negotiations had been undermined by several leaks this year.

A first public draft was released after the 8th round of negotiations that took place in Wellington, New Zealand in April this year.

A rumoured "final round of negotiations" would take place in Japan this month.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


ACTA leak cuts out ISP liability
"@peterniss suspect the AFACT treaty was part of the AU-US free trade agreement..."
By packet
 
 
 
Comments: 6
Paul K
Sep 6, 2010 6:09 PM
"Such a rule would require ISPs to disconnect users suspected of file-sharing on more than two occasions"

Heaven forbid they should hve to prove anything, or does suspicion = proof?
rycrozier
Sep 6, 2010 7:26 PM
That was the danger in what was being proposed - it would have circumvented rights holders having to get a court order/finding on authorisation.

If this leak is right, that situation has been averted, and the iiNet appeal finding will decide the issue locally instead.
peterniss
Sep 6, 2010 7:53 PM
Exactly why did Australia sign up to the AFACT treaty? Its not like there is anything of value in it for the country. The overwelming majority of movies, media, etc comes from the states so its obvious why America would want countries like ours to sign up just so they can impose draconian laws to stop anyone from sharing anything. Suspected of file-sharing? Two problems, suspected is not proven by a court of law and secondly file sharing doesnt mean files containing copywrite material sharing. The whole p2p is just for stealing things is just ignorant rubbish. Aust should do its own thing and tell the greedy bastards to go jump.
djzort
Sep 6, 2010 8:03 PM
how will this effect the NBN? seriously, ftth is just for piracy lets not kid ourselves.
peterniss
Sep 7, 2010 2:46 AM
djzort, FTTH is not just for piracy. Perhaps would be for you maybe but I suggest you do some research in to things like VoD and all the other on demand heavy bandwidth reliant services that would utilize the technology. Education and training for starters would hugely benefit from the technology not just those who want a faster connection. You have to think further than what you yourself would do with a faster link. Your starting to sound like former tech minister Richard Alston who famously said that broadband was just for porn. Perhaps it was for him, who knows?
packet
Sep 7, 2010 7:25 AM
@peterniss suspect the AFACT treaty was part of the AU-US free trade agreement...
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
iTnews on tour: The Executive Summit Series
Join us in Sydney and Melbourne to meet Australia's tech leaders.
 
NBN Co braces for secrecy probe
Opinion: Is commercial sensitivity a catch-all?
 
Exclusive: NBN Co withholds fibre upgrade price
Fears trial details could breach contractor confidentiality.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Was your 2012 IT budget...




   |   View results
Cut by less than ten percent?
  17%
 
Cut by more than ten percent?
  34%
 
Flat
  26%
 
Increased by less than ten percent?
  7%
 
Increased by more than ten percent?
  15%
TOTAL VOTES: 350

Vote
Will you still use DropBox and other cloud storage in the wake of the Megauploads saga?

   |   View results
Yes
  63%
 
No
  37%
TOTAL VOTES: 228

Vote