Report: Where to find the NBN's missing billions

 

Parliamentary Library does the numbers on Labor's NBN funding.

The Federal Parliamentary Library has released a 'background note' in attempt to shed some light on how a re-elected ALP Government would fund its commitments to the National Broadband Network (NBN).

The note, prepared by Brian Dalzell - a researcher in the Library's economics section - found that funding that had been allocated to the build of the NBN in budget measures did not match the total anticipated cost for building the network.

This, Dalzell noted, was primarily because "full funding allocation for the NBN has been and will continue to be an ongoing process."

The background note - written as an objective statement of fact - noted that so far, the ALP Government has allocated $2.942 billion from the Building Australia Fund until 2013/14 and $300 million from the sale of Commonwealth Government Securities (CGS) to institutional investors (aka Aussie Infrastructure Bonds) for the same period.

But in July, the author of the report discovered a far larger slice of funding for the NBN: a $13.6 billion sum the Gillard Government set aside for the three years to 2013/14 in its 'contingency reserve'.

The contingency reserve was a "temporary allowance" used by the Government to "reflect anticipated events that [could] not be assigned to individual programs in the preparation of the Australian Government's budget estimates."

Subsequently, this funding pool was not typically offered the same level of media scrutiny as funding released as part of the budget papers.

Gaps

The report noted that including the contingency reserve, the total amount allocated to the NBN until 2013/14 was $16.842 billion - still $5 billion shy of the $22.4 billion the authors of the NBN Implementation Study recommended the Government spend in the first five years of the network build.

The numbers also raised questions as to how the ALP Government would come up with enough funding in the years following 2013/14.

"If the realised build cost for the entire NBN were $43 billion, the Government must allocate/determine an additional $26.158 billion of funding from available sources," the report said.

Elsewhere, the report noted the Government had promised to provide $18.1 billion in equity to the NBN in the five years to 2013/14. To date, equity payments to NBN Co (as revealed by NBN Co chief Mike Quigley) totalled only $312 million, the author found.

In accounting terms, the report directly correlated any Government equity injections in NBN Co with an increase in Government debt.

"An increase in debt (liabilities) or a decrease in cash (financial assets) and a subsequent equity injection in NBN Co acts to increase net debt on the Government balance sheet while net worth and net financial worth remain unchanged," the report said.

Timing

The timing of the release of the report was sure to raise eyebrows. The question of the cost of networking Australia has taken centre stage in the Federal Election campaign.

Dalzell conceded in the study that the "expected costs and funding allocations have been a contentious political issue."

The Parliamentary Library was responsible for providing "high quality information, analysis and advice" to Senators and members of the House of Representatives that was both "timely" and "impartial".

The Economics Section of the Parliamentary Library was unable to disclose which Senators or other members of parliament had requested the analysis released today.

But iTnews understood that the Library's charter did not prevent its researchers from tackling contentious issues, as long as the issue was considered of broad importance to multiple political parties.

All papers were subject to a quality control process, according to the Library, which included final approval from the assistant secretary of the library's research branch.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Report: Where to find the NBN's missing billions
"lol RDEFCON, some of us are just wondering what the broohaha is all about. So these guys do not have the docs or data that exactly specifies when and from where the total funding would be ..."
By Maxxi2
 
 
 
Comments: 9
Rossyduck
Aug 16, 2010 5:21 PM
While we really need an NBN, this is getting dodgier by the minute. We basically have a bunch of ex-Telco executives who have never heard the word FttH until offered six figure salaries, who had no clue that there is(was) a thriving FttH industry in Australia and in terms of their funding should be buying from it, who it transpires are in a private company set up but not answerable to the budget estimates committee being funded with public money, specificlaly money from the future fund. Sweat deal if you can get it ! Interesting attempt to protect their jobs with the 1Gbps announcement in Tasmania. It is easy to provide a single service with 1Gbps, my understanding is the total bandwidth per pon is 2.5Gbps. So 2.5 servcies at 1Gbps ?
DavidJordan
Aug 16, 2010 6:05 PM
People have got caught up with the technology rather that how it is used. The reality is that we are a mobile society with greater use of smartphones, mobile laptops, iPods, iPads, etc. At a current banking conference it was identified that third world countries were advanced in some technology because they jumped fixed lines and moved straight to wireless broadband. Telstra profits have dropped as consumers are moving away from fixed phone lines in favour of mobile phones. Is fixed broadband the way of the future or is increased wireless broadband that the coalition will allow be more appropriate.
deteego
Aug 16, 2010 7:11 PM
To be honest, I wouldn't in the least be surprised if the actual cost ended up being double of that

Then there is the upkeep and afford-ability issues (plus many more)

The more you look at it in a cynical way, the more it looks like Labor pulling out a gimmick to try and lull young voters who either have no idea what they are talking about and are easily swayed, or who aren't realistic (or both). Kind of the same with giving everyone school kid a laptop (which didn't even really end reaching every school kid iirc)
Boxhead
Aug 16, 2010 11:01 PM
He is some basic maths from the companies that produce FTTH equipment. green field sites cost $2.5K per house,existing housing $4.5k, and old housing is unlimited for underground, so up goes the ugly aerial fibre. With about 8 million houses, lets say 5% of the houses where green field and the rest were existing, this comes to 35.2b, add 11b for paying Telstra out for cutting over customer, add 3.5b for backhaul. All tolled we are looking at 49.7b and this is with no blow outs in the budget.
RDEFCON1
Aug 17, 2010 12:01 AM
Oh come on you guys. This is a LABOR government. Surely we can trust them to spend the money wisely! I mean, the last time they screwed us was...?
RDEFCON1
Aug 17, 2010 12:05 AM
... apols for the cynical outburst.

But seriously, this is way too risky an investment for any government to undertake. We know they have a great vision without a business case - and that people are attracted by vision and bored by business cases... but at the end of the day, we've got to be sensible about how $40bn+ of taxpayer money is spent - and that really should have a proper cost-benefit analysis and funding plan attached.
golfman
Aug 17, 2010 8:34 AM
The NBN is a very risky investment indeed!

This is especially so in light of recent developments in the USA which find that Fibre to the Node can provide 100Mbps to households using their existing copper pairs - representing a major cost reduction and much faster implementation than its extremely expensive cousin Fibre to the Home. Effectively, massively expensive components of the NBN ie., wiring optic fibre to each household that wants high speed broadband, completely redundant.

Here's the juice:

https://sites.google.com/site/didjuliafoolya/nbn-already-redundant
RDEFCON1
Aug 20, 2010 11:02 AM
So where are all the NBN proponent's on this comment thread?

Gone awfully quiet...
Maxxi2
Aug 20, 2010 3:13 PM
lol RDEFCON, some of us are just wondering what the broohaha is all about. So these guys do not have the docs or data that exactly specifies when and from where the total funding would be applied/allocated/reserved.

Howver, if they had ever themselves, or any commenters had ever worked on such a project over such a timeframe, they would know that you allocate/commit the minimum required funding levels until you more specifics

Especially when the requirement is some years into the future.

So why the broohaha?? The equity components of the NBN hve not been finalised yet.
The Telstra deal and component has not been finalised yet.
The total costs have not been finalised yet.
We do not know what colour socks Quigley will be wearing in 2016 either...

Demanding or expecting financial details of this proportion for that timeframe is not commercial practice, nor is it meaningful to demand this data today.

Avagooweegend m8...
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
Top Stories
Photos: Google I/O 2013
Evolution not revolution.
 
Photos: NextDC builds S1 data centre
Prepares for September launch.
 
QLD Govt contributed to payroll project 'death spiral'
Inquiry hears from independent expert.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Do you prefer the Coalition's NBN policy?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 1596

Vote