Feds censor ISP data retention documents

 

Consultation paper could impede decision making, AG claims.

The Government has censored around 90 percent of a data retention consultation paper that was released this week under Australian Freedom of Information laws.

The documents, obtained by Fairfax Media journalist Ben Grubb, detail plans to mandate the retention of telecommunications data in a similar fashion to the European Directive on Data Retention.

They were distributed by the Attorney-General's Department (AGD) to internet service providers (ISP) at a telecommunications industry briefing in March.

Fairfax publication the Sydney Morning Herald has published copies of the document and an accompanying letter explaining the AGD's decision to censor parts of it.

"As the matters are not settled and proposed recommendations may not necessarily be adopted, release of such documents would not make a valuable contribution to public debate," wrote AGD legal officer Claudia Hernandez.

"Rather, I consider that release of such documents may lead to premature unnecessary debate and could potentially prejudice and impede government decision making."

Greens Senator Scott Ludlam criticised the AGD's decision, arguing that the Government should allow an "open discussion in the development of the best possible policy regime".

"This excuse is extraordinary," he said. "Why is the Department making such an effort to keep this information hidden?"

The proposal is under investigation in a Senate Inquiry into online privacy that involves Ludlam, is chaired by Liberals Senator Mary Jo Fisher, and will report on its findings by 20 October.


Feds censor ISP data retention documents
"Of course we must not criticise our Dear Leaders. We must support them unquestioningly against the forces of darkness (ie, anyone who thinks the DLs are ignorant ratbags). So itnews may have ..."
By anonymous
 
 
 
Comments: 2
deonast
Jul 24, 2010 9:03 PM
Pretty impressive from the government that vowed before they were elected last to be more open and transparent, but yet the freedom of information laws remain unchanged. Note freedom of information is not free, can be rather expensive and sadly looks like IT news have unfortunately done their doe this time around.
anonymous
Jul 25, 2010 2:27 PM

Of course we must not criticise our Dear Leaders. We must support them unquestioningly against the forces of darkness (ie, anyone who thinks the DLs are ignorant ratbags).

So itnews may have done their dough as far as this info is concerned, but now we can all see exactly how the pollies will use their secret censorship and data retention laws against us.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 509

Vote