Broadband 'critical' to future global development

 

As vital as transport, water or power, says UN Broadband Commission.

Broadband networks are as vital to the world's economic and social future as transport, water or power, according to the United Nations-backed Broadband Commission for Digital Development.

The group met yesterday in Geneva to discuss its vision for accelerating the development of broadband networks across the globe, and will present two reports to the UN in September.

The first will look at input from the commissioners at the event, and the second will analyse the challenges and opportunities in deploying broadband in all types of economies.

The second report will also look at the local needs, financing constraints and technical hurdles in areas where broadband is needed, and offer proposals on possible means of deploying networks in every country worldwide.

"In the 21st century, affordable, ubiquitous broadband networks will be as critical to social and economic prosperity as networks like transport, water and power," said Dr Hamadoun I Touré, secretary-general of the International Telecommunication Union.

"Just as connection to the power grid is now seen as a basic element of social and economic empowerment, so ubiquitous connectivity to broadband networks will be vital to the ongoing development of every nation worldwide."

UNESCO director general Irina Bokova added that, while ICT is helping to provide new opportunities for the creation, preservation, dissemination and use of information, more needs to be done to ensure that this is true across the board.

"We aim for the construction of inclusive knowledge societies in which people can transform information into knowledge and understanding that empowers them to improve their lives and contribute to social and economic development," she said.

"Universal access to broadband-enabled applications will be vital for achieving this goal."

Copyright ©v3.co.uk


Broadband 'critical' to future global development
"@realitybites. You're absolutely right. And i'm not against broadband - i'm just an advocate for decisions which make it more affordable. If broadband is so important, researchers (both technical ..."
By MerariSchroeder
 
 
 
Comments: 8
MerariSchroeder
Jul 14, 2010 9:34 AM
"secretary-general of the International Telecommunication Union."

So what is the UN Broadband commission? Is the whole organisation made up of Telecommunication stake holders?

I certainly believe what they're saying, broadband is important. However I do not believe it can be juxtaposed with basic human needs. Broadband can certainly help prosperity, but take away water and you can't live, take away broadband and you go into the bank (instead of eBanking).

I think an organisation with UN in its title shouldn't be making such profound statements. The statement is clearly one crafted to make broadband sound like God. What this organisation should be conveying is the message of "affordable" broadband. The world should be working together to achieve communications systems which can be afforded by people from all walks of life.
realitybites
Jul 14, 2010 11:19 AM
Whilst I agree that broadband is not essential for 'survival' as water, that wasn't the end conclusion I came to after reading the article. My impression was that in the terms of economic development and general quality of life improvement, fast and affordable broadband is as necessary as water. Using your bank example, it make no difference going to the bank as they would have no internet either.

In todays modern world energy and internet (in whatever it's form) is critical to the economic stability and well being of any country. If you take away either, the economy collapses and as such living conditions fall. In that context, it's as vital as water. Forgive any spelling mistakes, I had a late night :)

Edited by realitybites: 14/7/2010 11:21:46 AM
anonymous
Jul 14, 2010 12:03 PM

Of course broadband isn't essential.

Neither are roads, phones, power and gas supplies or aircraft.

Hmmm, on second thoughts. . .
ITnovice
Jul 14, 2010 10:16 PM
The internet does not feed people, but it does enrich the lives of the poor when used in a certain way. Rural farmers in India have used it to do their research, resulting in better farming knowledge, better crops, and more food on the table and money in their pocket. The UN know what they are talking about - from experience!
Ace
Jul 15, 2010 10:44 AM
Its one of those things where without broadband, countries will be left behind. It is easy to see the effect on places where their infrastructure barely lets people ride bicycles around, let alone make phone calls or connect to the internet. As other countries modernise, they will be less and less likely to deal with businesses in a country who cannot effectively communicate or trade online.

Life is about more than survival. There is Red Cross and others besides the UN to help out with that. The UN is, and should be interested in 'quality of life'.
MerariSchroeder
Jul 16, 2010 9:56 AM
"but it does enrich the lives of the poor when used in a certain way"

Yes but the message to the world should be that of affordability, especially from an organisation such as one entitled the UN Broadband commission. The more of any resource is better for impoverished regions, but they need to be able to afford it.
realitybites
Jul 16, 2010 11:20 AM
@Merari - I might be nitpicking, and no offense is intended, but affordability is a relative term. It can be applied globally, country by country and individually.
Having said that and after reading other comments posted, I have come to the conclusion that the UN has now included broadband as a criteria that developing contries can use to apply to organisations (IMF perhaps?) to secure low interest loans to help design, develop and implement infrastructure that delivers said service to it's citizens. Much like they can with things like health, water and transport, just to name a few.

If my assumptions/logic are/is correct then this a step in the right direction for developing countries.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.. Actually I'd like to be corrected if I'm wrong, as long as the correction is actually correct.. :)
MerariSchroeder
Jul 17, 2010 11:18 AM
@realitybites. You're absolutely right. And i'm not against broadband - i'm just an advocate for decisions which make it more affordable. If broadband is so important, researchers (both technical and economical) should be finding ways to get data down to $10/month with unlimited volumes for very fast speeds. When that happens ubiquity will follow. By just saying, everyone needs it, all countries will deploy and the poorer people will be left without. If people don't have to think about download volumes and monthly price, that's when it will be ubiquitous, and that means you can be MUCH more innovative with the delivery of services.

If you only have 80% of your population, you still can't innovate with education, you need 100%.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 509

Vote