Opinion: A real test of Telstra's marketing muscle

 

Can Telstra sell its customers and win them back again?

OPINION: Telstra has been delivered a golden opportunity to get paid to move customers off its ageing copper infrastructure, whilst still having the opportunity of winning those same customers over to a retail fibre plan before any competitor gets sight of them.

As part of the historic deal signed between Telstra and NBN Co yesterday, NBN Co would pay Telstra an undisclosed amount of money for every customer it transfers to NBN Co's wholesale fibre network - the sum of which Telstra expects to add up to $9 billion.

Government-owned NBN Co - that's you and me as taxpayers - would then pay to connect each of these customers to the National Broadband Network with Telstra bearing no cost.

As customer premises are being connected to fibre, the customer would be given a choice between the various retail service providers connected to the NBN Co wholesale fibre network - or for a limited time, to remain on copper or cable until these services are fully decommissioned (copper) or deactivated (cable).

Telstra, having received a payment from NBN Co for switching this customer over to the Government-owned fibre network, is therefore given the opportunity to pitch its retail services back to the same customer it just handed over - only in a slightly more competitive environment.

Telstra executives have said that the telco would be given access to the NBN "at the same price as anybody else". In other words, it won't receive favourable treatment from NBN Co.

But how much favourable treatment would Telstra need?

Telstra is likely to already have an existing billing relationship with the customer, and may have succeeded prior to the switchover in signing customers up to bundled plans of voice, telephony, mobiles and content/pay television services.

Bundles are complex products to untangle - especially over a 24-month contract. Today Telstra CEO David Thodey told journalists that while Telstra has agreed to support churning across to fibre services from a technical perspective (in terms of numbering, etc), a customer choosing a new retail service provider will be "subject to what [existing] contract [the customer] has in place.

"There's quite a bit to work through [on] this," he said.

All things being equal on price - which the NBN model just about ensures - some customers would find that being able to keep their existing billing relationship, phone numbers, email addresses, subscription television etc will make Telstra an attractive choice.

It will be the true test of Telstra's marketing team - cashed up courtesy of the $9 billion agreement - to ensure that such a message sticks - that the easiest transition to high speed fibre connectivity will be to remain with Telstra.

Telstra's retail competitors will need to invest in new products and services, or offer significant discounts, to compete.

If Telstra wins back a customer it was already paid to release onto NBN Co's fibre, this $11 billion deal is a stroke of genius for CEO David Thodey.

And if Telstra also wins a tender to build NBN Co's fibre network - which Telstra has flagged an interest in - it's a triple win for Telstra shareholders.

What do you think? Has Telstra negotiated a good deal?


Opinion: A real test of Telstra's marketing muscle
"I would take most of this, as it says as an opinion. If this goes through Telstra will have become a 3rd party ISP/company, with no network at all unlike say iinet, optus etc which would have a ..."
By zag
 
 
 
Comments: 2
Perdix
Jun 21, 2010 4:03 PM
Looks like Telstra gets a free ride into NBN land.
Cost of Customer acquisition is significant and is usually recovered over the period of the contract. If Telstra enjoys a $0 migration cost, and other ISP's have to pay for migration, then this is not a level playing field, and the absence of this cost will enable Telstra to undercut its competitors.
It seems that Telstra has leveraged itself into a very advantageous position against its competitors, and will potentially not be paying the same price as its competitors.
zag
Jun 21, 2010 4:52 PM
I would take most of this, as it says as an opinion.

If this goes through Telstra will have become a 3rd party ISP/company, with no network at all unlike say iinet, optus etc which would have a network base already installed, that might not be all that great overall for Telstra.

As I guess the gov will expect them to keep it running and if Telstra decides hey NBNCo you bought it you run it, we'll sack 10,000 employees which we have no reason to keep employed anymore and you can hire them or not up to you, if you want the network you bought to be maintained.

NBNCo has already started building and I'd hazard to say that these companies would get the preference over Telstra who could end up having no ability to even build a network anyway.

For Telstra to have a return customer they would need good deals which really is going to be the exact same deals as everyone else seeing as the NBNCo is just going to be exactly the same deal as it is today. so that's really a mute point.

though Telstra might be able to gain price wise due to them not having any sort of network to keep maintaining.

I reckon Telstra's shares will nose dive once the deal is signed and probably end up sold off to an overseas company, as the shares will be worth a couple of cents in the dollar.

The share rises companies have been talking about just haven't happened so far and it'd seem to me people are just buying it while it's cheap only to sell out it droves when it's at it's highest.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Vito Forte: A CIO for tough times
Fortescue Metals CIO talks vendor management and innovation.
 
Tech staff spared in ANZ's 1000 job cuts
Cost cutting hits middle management.
 
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  83%
 
No
  17%
TOTAL VOTES: 245

Vote