iiNet, Primus split on filter

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Optus, Telstra keep their heads low.

Primus CEO Ravi Bhatia has made a rare and brave show of support for Senator Conroy's plans to introduce a mandatory ISP-level internet filter, in stark contrast to the position taken by fellow service provider iiNet.

ISP iiNet issued a press release late yesterday to reassure customers and the industry that it does not support Senator Conroy's plans to filter the internet, refuting comments the Senator made in a Sydney Morning Herald article.

Senator Conroy had claimed his policy has been "approved by 85 per cent of Australian internet service providers, who have said they would welcome the filter, including Telstra, Optus, iPrimus and iiNet."

Michael Malone, CEO of iiNet, was outraged.

"Any claim that our participation in that consultation process is support for the Government's policy is an outright lie," he said in a statement.

"The proposed filter is fundamentally flawed, will not achieve its stated purpose and simply will not work. It is fundamentally bad policy. We do not and never have supported such a system."

"No western country operates a mandatory filter like this," Malone said. "This proposal lines Australia up with Burma, Saudi Arabia and China ... [and] is a waste of money that should be instead spent on additional law enforcement and education resources."

iTnews has contacted Optus, Telstra and Primus to seek their position.

In support of the filter, but not censorship

Primus CEO Ravi Bhatia stood behind Senator Conroy's plans to filter, pledging support for a policy he believes to be undersold and misunderstood.

Bhatia said Primus does not support any censorship of free speech or political thought, and is spirited about the role the internet can play in protecting political freedom and democracy.

He also believes that opponents of Conroy's web filtering plan are "well meaning". But he nonetheless asserts that many of them are fogged by "emotional responses" to the filter policy.

Concerns "a future government may misuse the ISP filters and extend the policy to cover freedom of speech or political dissent" were unfounded, he said.

"While this concern is borne out of good intentions, Australia has a vibrant democracy with strong checks and balances and institutions to protect our freedoms," Bhatia said.

"Our exceptionally strong democratic traditions and political-legal systems would countenance any attempts by a future government to use ISP filter to stifle free speech or political rights.

"That said, I understand the Government will be implementing robust processes around determining which content will be blocked. There will be recourse available if someone believes content has been wrongly blocked."

The Primus chief also disagrees with those who oppose the filter plan on the premise that it is technically flawed.

"Sure, some people may wish to get around the filter, and we will deal with that in time," he said. "But I don't believe many Australian families will want to bypass it."

Bhatia said it is also important to note that the filter is "one component of the cyber-safety measures" required to protect Australians from harmful content.

"If a filter helps keep families safe on the internet then I'm not going to object to it," he said. "Should we for example repeal anti-money laundering or drug laws just because they are only partially effective?"

Bhatia asserts that if most Australians were polled specifically around the details of Senator Conroy's filtering plan, there would be "overwhelming support" in relation to content that involves "child porn, rape, bestiality, drug making and training for terrorism et al".

But he does not believe the Government needs to narrow the scope of the filter plan to reach a compromise with dissenting ISP's and civil liberty groups.

"The government needs to present its case much, much better than hitherto," he said.


iiNet, Primus split on filter
 
 
 
Top Stories
Matching databases to Linux distros
Reviewed: OS-repository DBMSs, MariaDB vs MySQL.
 
Coalition's NBN cost-benefit study finds in favour of MTM
FTTP costs too much, would take too long.
 
Who'd have picked a BlackBerry for the Internet of Things?
[Blog] BlackBerry has a more secure future in the physical world.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
Looking for storage? Seagate has five new small business NAS devices
Aug 22, 2014
Seagate has announced a new portfolio of Networked Attached Storage (NAS) solutions specifically ...
Run a small business in western Sydney?
Aug 15, 2014
This event might be of interest if you're looking to meet other people with a similar interest ...
Buying a tablet? Microsoft's Surface Pro 3 goes on sale this month
Aug 8, 2014
Microsoft has announced its Surface Pro 3 will go on sale in Australia on 28 August from ...
Apple's top MacBook Pro with Retina is now cheaper
Aug 1, 2014
Apple has updated its MacBook Pro range with faster processors and new pricing, including ...
Pass on carbon tax savings, warns ACCC
Jul 24, 2014
The ACCC is warning businesses that supply "regulated goods" to pass on any cost savings ...
Latest Comments
Polls
Which is the most prevalent cyber attack method your organisation faces?




   |   View results
Phishing and social engineering
  70%
 
Advanced persistent threats
  3%
 
Unpatched or unsupported software vulnerabilities
  11%
 
Denial of service attacks
  6%
 
Insider threats
  10%
TOTAL VOTES: 715

Vote